Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38015209›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2024

Knot holding capacity of two different high-strength sutures-a biomechanical analysis.

Kenneth P van Knegsel, Ivan Zderic, Philipp Kastner, Peter Varga, Matthias Knobe, Till Berk, Boyko Gueorguiev, Torsten Pastor

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biomechanical evaluation of cerclage wiring in plated tibia fractures using human and synthetic specimens.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Biomechanical evaluation of double-stranded knot configurations in high-strength sutures and tapes.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kenneth P van KnegselAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Ivan ZdericAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Philipp KastnerAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Peter VargaAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Matthias KnobeMedical Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Till BerkAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Boyko GueorguievAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland.
Torsten PastorAO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland. Torsten.Pastor@Luks.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-4357-236X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe number of seven required throws per knot was previously reported as providing sufficient security against slippage. A novel high-strength suture featuring dynamic tightening may allow for throw number reduction without compromising stability. The aims of this study were to (1) investigate the influence of the throw number and the effect of different ambient conditions on the knot security of two different high-strength sutures, and (2) compare their biomechanical competence.

methodsTwo sutures (FiberWire (FW) and DynaCord (DC)) were considered for preparing alternating surgical knots. The specimens were stratified for exposure to different media during biomechanical testing-namely air (dry), saline solution (wet), and fat (fatty-wet). A monotonic tensile ramp loading to failure was applied in each test run. For each suture and ambient condition, seven specimens with three to seven throws each were tested (n = 7), evaluating their slippage and ultimate force to failure. The minimum number of throws preventing suture unraveling was determined for each suture type and condition.

resultsFor each suture type and condition, failure occurred via rupture in all specimens for the following minimum number of throws: FW-dry-7, wet-7, fatty-wet-7; DC-dry-6, wet-4, fatty-wet-5. When applying seven throws, FW demonstrated significantly larger slippage (6.5 ± 2.2 mm) versus DC (3.5 ± 0.4 mm) in wet (p = 0.004) but not in dry and fatty-wet conditions (p ≥ 0.313).

conclusionsThe lower number of throws providing knot security of DC versus FW in the more realistic wet and fatty-wet conditions indicates that the novel DC suture may allow to decrease the foreign body volume and save surgical time without compromising the biomechanical competence.

Indexed as

SuturesSuture TechniquesHumansMaterials TestingRuptureTensile StrengthBiomechanical testDynaCordFiberWireHigh-strength sutureRuptureSlippageThrow number

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.