ArticleJournal of athletic training2024
Instrumented Static and Reactive Balance in Collegiate Athletes: Normative Values and Minimal Detectable Change.
Article in Journal of athletic training, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cortical activity during preparation and execution of balance recovery behavior in people after mild traumatic brain injury: A preliminary investigation.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Acute and Longitudinal Effects of Concussion on Reactive Balance in Collegiate Athletes.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
contextWearable sensors are increasingly popular in concussion research because of their objective quantification of subtle balance deficits. However, normative data and minimal detectable change (MDC) values are necessary to serve as references for diagnostic use and tracking longitudinal recovery.
objectiveTo identify normative and MDC values for instrumented static- and reactive-balance tests, an instrumented static mediolateral (ML) root mean square (RMS) sway standing balance assessment and the instrumented, modified push and release (I-mP&R), respectively.
designCross-sectional study.
settingClinical setting. PATIENTS OR OTHER
participantsNormative static ML RMS sway and I-mP&R data were collected on 377 (n = 184 female) healthy National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes at the beginning of their competitive seasons. Test-retest data were collected in 36 healthy control athletes based on standard recovery timelines after concussion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Descriptive statistics, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and MDC values were calculated for primary outcomes of ML RMS sway in a static double-limb stance on firm ground and a foam block, and time to stability and latency from the I-mP&R in single- and dual-task conditions.
resultsNormative outcomes across static ML RMS sway and I-mP&R were sensitive to sex and type of footwear. Mediolateral RMS sway demonstrated moderate reliability in the firm condition (ICC = 0.73; MDC = 2.7 cm/s2) but poor reliability in the foam condition (ICC = 0.43; MDC = 11.1 cm/s2). Single- and dual-task times to stability from the I-mP&R exhibited good reliability (ICC = 0.84 and 0.80, respectively; MDC = 0.25 and 0.29 seconds, respectively). Latency from the I-mP&R had poor to moderate reliability (ICC = 0.38 and 0.55; MDC = 107 and 105 milliseconds).
conclusionsSex-matched references should be used for instrumented static- and reactive-balance assessments. Footwear may explain variability in static ML RMS sway and time to stability of the I-mP&R. Moderate-to-good reliability suggests time to stability from the I-mP&R and ML RMS static sway on firm ground can be used for longitudinal assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.