ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Networks extracted from nonlinear fMRI connectivity exhibit unique spatial variation and enhanced sensitivity to differences between individuals with schizophrenia and controls.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies often estimate brain intrinsic connectivity networks (ICNs) from temporal relationships between hemodynamic signals using approaches such as independent component analysis (ICA). While ICNs are thought to represent functional sources that play important roles in various psychological phenomena, current approaches have been tailored to identify ICNs that mainly reflect linear statistical relationships. However, the elements comprising neural systems often exhibit remarkably complex nonlinear interactions that may be involved in cognitive operations and altered in psychiatric conditions such as schizophrenia. Consequently, there is a need to develop methods capable of effectively capturing ICNs from measures that are sensitive to nonlinear relationships. Here, we advance a novel approach to estimate ICNs from explicitly nonlinear whole-brain functional connectivity (ENL-wFC) by transforming resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI) data into the connectivity domain, allowing us to capture unique information from distance correlation patterns that would be missed by linear whole-brain functional connectivity (LIN-wFC) analysis. Our findings provide evidence that ICNs commonly extracted from linear (LIN) relationships are also reflected in explicitly nonlinear (ENL) connectivity patterns. ENL ICN estimates exhibit higher reliability and stability, highlighting our approach's ability to effectively quantify ICNs from rsfMRI data. Additionally, we observed a consistent spatial gradient pattern between LIN and ENL ICNs with higher ENL weight in core ICN regions, suggesting that ICN function may be subserved by nonlinear processes concentrated within network centers. We also found that a uniquely identified ENL ICN distinguished individuals with schizophrenia from healthy controls while a uniquely identified LIN ICN did not, emphasizing the valuable complementary information that can be gained by incorporating measures that are sensitive to nonlinearity in future analyses. Moreover, the ENL estimates of ICNs associated with auditory, linguistic, sensorimotor, and self-referential processes exhibit heightened sensitivity towards differentiating between individuals with schizophrenia and controls compared to LIN counterparts, demonstrating the translational value of our approach and of the ENL estimates of ICNs that are frequently reported as disrupted in schizophrenia. In summary, our findings underscore the tremendous potential of connectivity domain ICA and nonlinear information in resolving complex brain phenomena and revolutionizing the landscape of clinical FC analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.