Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38014017›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Lesions to different regions of frontal cortex have dissociable effects on voluntary persistence.

Camilla van Geen, Yixin Chen, Rebecca Kazinka, Avinash R Vaidya, Joseph W Kable, Joseph T McGuire

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Camilla van GeenDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0002-4948-5550
Yixin ChenDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215.
Rebecca KazinkaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455.ORCID 0000-0003-1414-8164
Avinash R VaidyaNIDA Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD 21224.ORCID 0000-0001-5423-5655
Joseph W KableDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0001-6495-9040
Joseph T McGuireDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215.ORCID 0000-0001-6259-0809
Boston University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Neurocomputational mechanisms of learning and decision-making and their disruption in addiction ZIADA000642 · NIDA · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE · PI KAHNT, THORSTEN · 2022 to 2025
$7.2M
Neural mechanisms underlying changes in preferenceR01DA029149 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KABLE, JOSEPH W · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
Modeling Dimensions of Individual Variation in Adaptive Foraging DecisionsR21MH124095 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI FULFORD, DANIEL C, MCGUIRE, JOSEPH T. · 2021 to 2022
$454k
Temporal dynamics and neural mechanisms of preference reversalF32DA030870 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MCGUIRE, JOSEPH T. · 2011 to 2013
$148k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DA000642NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA030870NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029149NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH124095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deciding how long to keep waiting for uncertain future rewards is a complex problem. Previous research has shown that choosing to stop waiting results from an evaluative process that weighs the subjective value of the awaited reward against the opportunity cost of waiting. In functional neuroimaging data, activity in ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) tracks the dynamics of this evaluation, while activation in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) and anterior insula (AI) ramps up before a decision to quit is made. Here, we provide causal evidence of the necessity of these brain regions for successful performance in a willingness-to-wait task. 28 participants with frontal lobe lesions were tested on their ability to adaptively calibrate how long they waited for monetary rewards. We grouped the participants based on the location of their lesions, which were primarily in ventromedial, dorsomedial, or lateral parts of their prefrontal cortex (vmPFC, dmPFC, and lPFC, respectively), or in the anterior insula. We compared the performance of each subset of lesion participants to behavior in a control group without lesions (n=18). Finally, we fit a newly developed computational model to the data to glean a more mechanistic understanding of how lesions affect the cognitive processes underlying choice. We found that participants with lesions to the vmPFC waited less overall, while participants with lesions to the dmPFC and anterior insula were specifically impaired at calibrating their level of persistence to the environment. These behavioral effects were accounted for by systematic differences in parameter estimates from a computational model of task performance: while the vmPFC group showed reduced initial willingness to wait, lesions to the dmPFC/anterior insula were associated with slower learning from negative feedback. These findings corroborate the notion that failures of persistence can be driven by sophisticated cost-benefit analyses rather than lapses in self-control. They also support the functional specialization of different parts of the prefrontal cortex in service of voluntary persistence.

Indexed as

brain lesionsdecision-makingwillingness to wait

Identifiers

PMID38014017
PMCPMC10680867
OpenAlexW4388749412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.