ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Macromolecule modelling for improved metabolite quantification using short echo time brain
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To improve reliability of metabolite quantification at both, 3 T and 7 T, we propose a novel parametrized macromolecules quantification model (PRaMM) for brain Methods: Full- and metabolite-nulled spectra were acquired in three different brain regions with different ratios of grey and white matter from six healthy volunteers, at both 3 T and 7 T. Metabolite-nulled spectra were used to identify highly correlated macromolecular signal contributions and estimate the ratios of their intensities. These ratios were then used as soft constraints in the proposed PRaMM model for quantification of full spectra. The PRaMM model was validated by comparison with a single component macromolecule model and a macromolecule subtraction technique. Moreover, the influence of the PRaMM model on the repeatability and reproducibility compared to those other methods was investigated. Results: The developed PRaMM model performed better than the two other approaches in all three investigated brain regions. Several estimates of metabolite concentration and their Cramér-Rao lower bounds were affected by the PRaMM model reproducibility, and repeatability of the achieved concentrations were tested by evaluating the method on a second repeated acquisitions dataset. While the observed effects on both metrics were not significant, the fit quality metrics were improved for the PRaMM method (p≤0.0001). Minimally detectable changes are in the range 0.5 - 1.9 mM and percent coefficients of variations are lower than 10% for almost all the clinically relevant metabolites. Furthermore, potential overparameterization was ruled out. Conclusion: Here, the PRaMM model, a method for an improved quantification of metabolites was developed, and a method to investigate the role of the MM background and its individual components from a clinical perspective is proposed.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.