Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38013993›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Interpreting

Evan E Seitz, David M McCandlish, Justin B Kinney, Peter K Koo

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Evan E SeitzSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
David M McCandlishSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Justin B KinneySimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1897-3778
Peter K KooSimons Center for Quantitative Biology, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8722-0038

Funding

A unified quantitative modeling strategy for multiplex assays of variant effectR01HG011787 · NHGRI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI JUSTIN B. KINNEY · 2022 to 2026
$4.1M
Computational analysis of complex genetic interactionsR35GM133613 · NIGMS · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI David Martin McCandlish · 2019 to 2026
$3.5M
Biophysical modeling of cis-regulatory complexes in transcription and splicing using massively parallel reporter assaysR35GM133777 · NIGMS · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI KINNEY, JUSTIN B. · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
Interpretable Computational Models of Functional Genomics DataR01HG012131 · NHGRI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI Peter K Koo · 2022 to 2026
$2.1M
Reliable post hoc interpretations of deep learning in genomicsR01GM149921 · NIGMS · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI Peter K Koo · 2023 to 2026
$1.7M
Graphical Processing Units and a Large-Memory Compute Node for Applications in Genomics, Neuroscience, and Structural BiologyS10OD028632 · OD · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI SIEPEL, ADAM CHARLES · 2020 to 2020
$437k
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011787NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012131NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM149921NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133613NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133777NIH HHS S10 OD028632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have greatly advanced the ability to predict genome function from sequence. Interpreting genomic DNNs in terms of biological mechanisms, however, remains difficult. Here we introduce SQUID, a genomic DNN interpretability framework based on surrogate modeling. SQUID approximates genomic DNNs in user-specified regions of sequence space using surrogate models, i.e., simpler models that are mechanistically interpretable. Importantly, SQUID removes the confounding effects that nonlinearities and heteroscedastic noise in functional genomics data can have on model interpretation. Benchmarking analysis on multiple genomic DNNs shows that SQUID, when compared to established interpretability methods, identifies motifs that are more consistent across genomic loci and yields improved single-nucleotide variant-effect predictions. SQUID also supports surrogate models that quantify epistatic interactions within and between

Identifiers

PMID38013993
PMCPMC10680760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.