Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38013972›Full record

ArticleClinical immunology communications2022

SARS-CoV-2 antibody determination in a vaccinated and recovered cohort in Austria.

Elisabeth Mara, Tobias Mader, Johannes Gratzer, Stefanie Hochegger, Thomas Pekar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical immunology communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Considerations on COVID-19 vaccination.Clinical immunology communications · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elisabeth MaraBiomedical Science, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Tobias MaderBiomedical Science, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Johannes GratzerBiomedical Science, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Stefanie HocheggerBiomedical Science, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
Thomas PekarBiomedical Science, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since December 2019 the world has been dealing with a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. The first SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was made available in Europe at the end of 2020. 202 volunteers from the vicinity of the University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt took part in this study; their IgG levels recognizing the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 were determined. The aim was to evaluate the SARS-CoV-2 titer levels of vaccinated, recovered and vaccinated plus recovered persons. We could show that there is a significant difference in the antibody levels of vaccinated, vaccinated plus recovered and only recovered probands. Additionally, the highest antibody levels were found in triple vaccinated persons. Furthermore, the Moderna vaccine seems to have a higher immune response.

Indexed as

IgG determinationRBDSARS-CoV-2Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID38013972
PMCPMC9472700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.