Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38013874›Full record

ArticleGlobal surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education2023

The impact of virtual negotiation training for female faculty.

Anees B Chagpar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Anees B ChagparDepartment of Surgery, Yale University, 310 Cedar Street, Lauder Hall 118, New Haven, CT 06510 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7641-4443

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We developed a virtual interactive course for female faculty/practicing physicians and trainees to hone their skills in negotiation and sought to evaluate the impact of this on their knowledge, comfort, and skill in negotiation. Methods: We surveyed participants as to their comfort and experience with negotiation before and after the course, as well as three months later. Results: Of the 102 participants in the faculty course, 55 (53.9%) were academic ladder faculty, and 47 (46.1%) were in surgery or a surgical subspecialty. Participants were significantly more comfortable with negotiation initiation, strategy, and post-settlement settlement after the course ( Conclusion: Negotiation training can have a significant impact on female physicians' comfort in initiating negotiation, negotiation strategy and post-settlement discussions. Such training significantly increases "better than expected" negotiations.

Indexed as

DisparitiesFemaleGenderNegotiationTraining

Identifiers

PMID38013874
PMCPMC9838252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.