Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38013815›Full record

ArticleDigital discovery2023

Teaching old presumptive tests new digital tricks with computer vision for forensic applications.

Nathalie Bugeja, Cameron Oliver, Nicole McGrath, Jake McGuire, Chunhui Yan, Felicity Carlysle-Davies, Marc Reid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital discovery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Parallel and High Throughput Reaction Monitoring with Computer Vision.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathalie BugejaDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK marc.reid.100@strath.ac.uk.
Cameron OliverDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK marc.reid.100@strath.ac.uk.
Nicole McGrathDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK marc.reid.100@strath.ac.uk.
Jake McGuireDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK marc.reid.100@strath.ac.uk.
Chunhui YanDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK marc.reid.100@strath.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9921-3898
Felicity Carlysle-DaviesCentre for Forensic Science, University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2256-796X
Marc ReidDepartment of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK marc.reid.100@strath.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4394-3132

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Presumptive (or 'spot') tests have served forensic scientists, law enforcement, and legal practitioners for over a hundred years. Yet, the intended design of such tests, enabling quick identification of drugs by-eye, also hides their full potential. Here, we report the development and application of time-resolved imaging methods of reactions attending spot tests for amphetamines, barbiturates, and benzodiazepines. Analysis of the reaction videos helps distinguish drugs within the same structural class that, by-eye, are judged to give the same qualitative spot test result. It is envisaged that application of these results will bridge the existing suite of field and lab-based confirmatory forensic tests, and support a broader range of colorimetric sensing technologies.

Identifiers

PMID38013815
PMCPMC10408571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.