Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38013813›Full record

ArticleDigital discovery2023

Discovery of lead quinone cathode materials for Li-ion batteries.

Xuan Zhou, Abhishek Khetan, Jie Zheng, Mark Huijben, René A J Janssen, Süleyman Er

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital discovery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xuan ZhouDIFFER - Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research De Zaale 20 5612 AJ Eindhoven the Netherlands s.er@differ.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8356-7747
Abhishek KhetanDIFFER - Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research De Zaale 20 5612 AJ Eindhoven the Netherlands s.er@differ.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2260-8271
Jie ZhengMESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente Enschede 7500 AE the Netherlands.
Mark HuijbenMESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente Enschede 7500 AE the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8175-6958
René A J JanssenDIFFER - Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research De Zaale 20 5612 AJ Eindhoven the Netherlands s.er@differ.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1920-5124
Süleyman ErDIFFER - Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research De Zaale 20 5612 AJ Eindhoven the Netherlands s.er@differ.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5005-3894

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organic cathode materials are attractive candidates for the development of high-performance Li-ion batteries (LIBs). The chemical space of candidate molecules is too vast to be explored solely by experiments; however, it can be systematically explored by a high-throughput computational search that incorporates a spectrum of screening techniques. Here, we present a time- and resource-efficient computational scheme that incorporates machine learning and semi-empirical quantum mechanical methods to study the chemical space of approximately 200 000 quinone-based molecules for use as cathode materials in LIBs. By performing an automated search on a commercial vendor database, computing battery-relevant properties such as redox potential, gravimetric charge capacity, gravimetric energy density, and synthetic complexity score, and evaluating the structural integrity upon the lithiation process, a total of 349 molecules were identified as potentially high-performing cathode materials for LIBs. The chemical space of the screened candidates was visualized using dimensionality reduction methods with the aim of further downselecting the best candidates for experimental validation. One such directly purchasable candidate, 1,4,9,10-anthracenetetraone, was analyzed through cyclic voltammetry experiments. The measured redox potentials of the two lithiation steps, , of 3.3 and 2.4 V, were in good agreement with the predicted redox potentials, , of 3.2 and 2.3 V

Identifiers

PMID38013813
PMCPMC10408572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.