Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38013772›Full record

ArticleBehavior and social issues2022

Behavioral community psychology in the Amazon rainforest: Suggestions for when behavior analysts meet alterity.

Felipe Bulzico da Silva, Guilherme Bergo Leugi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior and social issues, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Felipe Bulzico da SilvaPost-Graduate Doctoral Program in Developmental and Learning Psychology from the Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Avenida Eng. Luiz Edmundo Carrijo Coube, 14-01, Vargem Limpa, Bauru, SP CEP: 17033-360 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9409-1243
Guilherme Bergo LeugiDepartment of Psychology, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Rua Vigário Carlos, 100, sala 525, Nossa Senhora da Abadia, Uberaba, MG CEP: 38025-350 Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0037-0138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present paper aimed to discuss and interpret methodological issues and contributions arising mainly from professional field work conducted by a behavior analyst working as a behavioral community psychologist in the Amazon rainforest, in northern Brazil. We looked at such a professional's day-to-day circumstances and challenges within a semi-isolated Indigenous community, and systematized impressions and implications for practice with diverse verbal communities and social groups. We believe that looking at experience with those specific social contexts enables us to critically examine behavior analysis community practice more generally. We provided examples of said practices and examined their explicit and more subtle consequences. In light of that, we discussed features of a collaborative methodological stance while working in the field that we wish to foster and encourage. We conclude by pointing out advantages of more in-depth and intensive relational methods for behavior analysts in community practice.

Indexed as

AlterityBehavior analysisCollaborative methodsCommunity psychologyCultural practicesIntensive methods

Identifiers

PMID38013772
PMCPMC9521860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.