Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38013723›Full record

ArticleComputer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & visualization2022

Deep learning approach for hyperspectral image demosaicking, spectral correction and high-resolution RGB reconstruction.

Peichao Li, Michael Ebner, Philip Noonan, Conor Horgan, Anisha Bahl, Sébastien Ourselin, Jonathan Shapey, Tom Vercauteren

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering. Imaging & visualization, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Synthetic white balancing for intra-operative hyperspectral imaging.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peichao LiSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Michael EbnerSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Philip NoonanSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Conor HorganSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Anisha BahlSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Sébastien OurselinSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5694-5340
Jonathan ShapeySchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Tom VercauterenSchool of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1794-0456
King's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperspectral imaging is one of the most promising techniques for intraoperative tissue characterisation. Snapshot mosaic cameras, which can capture hyperspectral data in a single exposure, have the potential to make a real-time hyperspectral imaging system for surgical decision-making possible. However, optimal exploitation of the captured data requires solving an ill-posed demosaicking problem and applying additional spectral corrections. In this work, we propose a supervised learning-based image demosaicking algorithm for snapshot hyperspectral images. Due to the lack of publicly available medical images acquired with snapshot mosaic cameras, a synthetic image generation approach is proposed to simulate snapshot images from existing medical image datasets captured by high-resolution, but slow, hyperspectral imaging devices. Image reconstruction is achieved using convolutional neural networks for hyperspectral image super-resolution, followed by spectral correction using a sensor-specific calibration matrix. The results are evaluated both quantitatively and qualitatively, showing clear improvements in image quality compared to a baseline demosaicking method using linear interpolation. Moreover, the fast processing time of 45 ms of our algorithm to obtain super-resolved RGB or oxygenation saturation maps per image for a state-of-the-art snapshot mosaic camera demonstrates the potential for its seamless integration into real-time surgical hyperspectral imaging applications.

Indexed as

deep learningdemosaickingHyperspectral imagingsurgical imaging

Identifiers

PMID38013723
PMCPMC10461732
OpenAlexW3197430628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.