Trial reportCombinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening2024
Clinical Study on the Treatment of Non-isotropic Cervical Spondylosis by Neck Pain Granules Combined with Tuina.
Trial report in Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Jingtong Granules for Cervicogenic Headache: Clinical Efficacy, Mechanisms, and Translational Potential.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Needle-Knife Therapy Relieves Inflammation and Neuronal Apoptosis in Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy via IRE1α-XBP1 Signaling.Global spine journal · 2026Article
- Establishment and evaluation of a rat model of cervical spondylosis with Yin deficiency syndrome.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of traditional Chinese medicine combined with Chinese massage therapy for enhancing cervical function in cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysis.American journal of translational research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical spondylotic radiculopathy is a common form of cervical spondylosis caused by degeneration of the cervical spine. Currently, non-surgical treatment is the preferred treatment method, and Chinese medicine is widely used.
objectiveTo investigate the effect of radiculopathy spondylosis by tuina spinning and lifting technique.
methodsExperimental Design: We conducted a 12-week, open-label, analyst-blinded, randomized clinical trial (2 weeks of intervention plus 10 weeks of observational follow-up). A total of 25 patients with radiculopathy were collected, and data was analyzed during the treatment and recovery period.
interventionsNeck pain granules group: a package of oral neck pain granules after meals, three times a day, treatment for 2 weeks; neck pain granules combined with massage lifting technique, treatment group: use, massage lifting technique treatment, once every two days, normal take neck pain granules, treatment for 2 weeks. All cases were followed up for 2.5 months. Main Monitoring Indicators: Visual Analog Scale, Neck Dysfunction Index score, and Tanaka jiu (Tanaka Yasuhisa Cervical Spondylosis Symptom Scale) were recorded on time, and statistical statistics were made.
resultThe scores of VAS and NDI were significantly more effective in the neck pain granules combined with the tuina group than in the neck pain granules group, while the Tanaka Yasuhisa Cervical Spondylosis Symptom Scale was not significantly different between the two groups.
conclusionThe treatment effect of neck pain granules combined with tuina was significantly better than that of traditional Chinese medicine alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.