ArticleHuman resources for health2023
Characterising support and care assistants in formal hospital settings: a scoping review.
Article in Human resources for health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Evolving Role of Nurses in Hospital Settings-A Scoping Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Role Clarity Among Patient Care Technicians in Saudi Arabia: Outcomes of a Structured Educational Program.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Pathways for enhancing service capability of primary healthcare institutions: a dynamic qualitative comparative analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- From compliance to risk: A paradigm for nursing and midwifery regulation in Ireland.Journal of nursing regulation · 2026Article
- Integration of Care Assistants Into Intensive Care Nursing Teams: A Multimethod Study.Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
- The reality of neonatal nursing work in Kenya and implications for quality and safety: Direct observation of tasks and time utilisation.International journal of nursing studies · 2025Article
- Applying a multi-layered, mixed methods approach to evaluate technology and workforce interventions in Kenyan neonatal units.Global health action · 2025Article
- Nurses experiences with an intervention enhancing skill-mix in Kenyan neonatal units with severe workforce deficits: A qualitative study.International journal of nursing studies · 2025Article
- Implementation of a task-shifting and task sharing intervention: A case of ward assistants in Kenyan neonatal units.International journal of nursing studies · 2025Article
- Exploring the core characteristics of competence in healthcare assistants: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Delivery of care in high mortality hospital settings: a direct observational study examining 1848 h of neonatal nursing in Kenya.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Strengthening neonatal care through ward assistants: a Kenyan case study in enhancing infection prevention and control practices.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Article
- Experiences of Iranian Nurses in Employing Nurse Assistants: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
- Comparison of basic and specialized care between nursing assistants and professional nurses.Revista CuidarteArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA 15 million health workforce shortage is still experienced globally leading to a sub-optimal healthcare worker-to-population ratio in most countries. The use of low-skilled care assistants has been suggested as a cost-saving human resource for health strategy that can significantly reduce the risks of rationed, delayed, or missed care. However, the characterisation, role assignment, regulation, and clinical governance mechanisms for unlicensed assistive workforce remain unclear or inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to map and collate evidence of how care assistants are labelled, utilised, regulated, and managed in formal hospital settings as well as their impact on patient care.
methodsWe conducted a scoping review of literature from PUBMED, CINAHL, PsychINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Searches and eligibility screening were conducted using the Participants-Context-Concepts framework. Thematic content analysis guided the synthesis of the findings.
results73 records from a total of 15 countries were included in the final full-text review and synthesis. A majority (78%) of these sources were from high-income countries. Many titles are used to describe care assistants, and these vary within and across countries. On ascribed roles, care assistants perform direct patient care, housekeeping, clerical and documentation, portering, patient flow management, ordering of laboratory tests, emergency response and first aid duties. Additional extended roles that require higher competency levels exist in the United States, Australia, and Canada. There is a mixture of both positive and negative sentiments on their impact on patient care or nurses' perception and experiences. Clinical and organisational governance mechanisms vary substantially across the 15 countries. Licensure, regulatory mechanisms, and task-shifting policies are largely absent or not reported in these countries.
conclusionsThe nomenclature used to describe care assistants and the tasks they perform vary substantially within countries and across healthcare systems. There is, therefore, a need to review and update the international and national classification of occupations for clarity and more meaningful nomenclature for care assistants. In addition, the association between care assistants and care outcomes or nurses' experience remains unclear. Furthermore, there is a dearth of empirical evidence on this topic from low- and middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.