Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38012737›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2023

Characterising support and care assistants in formal hospital settings: a scoping review.

Vincent A Kagonya, Onesmus O Onyango, Michuki Maina, David Gathara, Mike English, Abdulazeez Imam

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vincent A KagonyaHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. VKagonya@kemri-wellcome.org.ORCID 0000-0001-7098-5958
Onesmus O OnyangoHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Michuki MainaHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
David GatharaHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mike EnglishHealth Services Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Abdulazeez ImamNuffield Department of Medicine, Health Systems Collaborative, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KEUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 092654Wellcome Trust 207522Wellcome Trust 207522/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA 15 million health workforce shortage is still experienced globally leading to a sub-optimal healthcare worker-to-population ratio in most countries. The use of low-skilled care assistants has been suggested as a cost-saving human resource for health strategy that can significantly reduce the risks of rationed, delayed, or missed care. However, the characterisation, role assignment, regulation, and clinical governance mechanisms for unlicensed assistive workforce remain unclear or inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to map and collate evidence of how care assistants are labelled, utilised, regulated, and managed in formal hospital settings as well as their impact on patient care.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review of literature from PUBMED, CINAHL, PsychINFO, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Searches and eligibility screening were conducted using the Participants-Context-Concepts framework. Thematic content analysis guided the synthesis of the findings.

results73 records from a total of 15 countries were included in the final full-text review and synthesis. A majority (78%) of these sources were from high-income countries. Many titles are used to describe care assistants, and these vary within and across countries. On ascribed roles, care assistants perform direct patient care, housekeeping, clerical and documentation, portering, patient flow management, ordering of laboratory tests, emergency response and first aid duties. Additional extended roles that require higher competency levels exist in the United States, Australia, and Canada. There is a mixture of both positive and negative sentiments on their impact on patient care or nurses' perception and experiences. Clinical and organisational governance mechanisms vary substantially across the 15 countries. Licensure, regulatory mechanisms, and task-shifting policies are largely absent or not reported in these countries.

conclusionsThe nomenclature used to describe care assistants and the tasks they perform vary substantially within countries and across healthcare systems. There is, therefore, a need to review and update the international and national classification of occupations for clarity and more meaningful nomenclature for care assistants. In addition, the association between care assistants and care outcomes or nurses' experience remains unclear. Furthermore, there is a dearth of empirical evidence on this topic from low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelAustraliaCanadaHospitalsHumansCare assistantHealth workforceHuman resources for healthTask-shifting

Identifiers

PMID38012737
PMCPMC10680191
OpenAlexW4389049409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.