SynthesisBMC medicine2023
Prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in operable non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and reconstructed individual patient-data based meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prognostic utility of circulating tumor DNA assessment in immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Circulating tumor DNA predicts prognosis at different time points in patients with esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- [Research Progress on Circulating Tumor DNA Status and Postoperative Central Nervous System Recurrence Risk and Overall Survival in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA dynamics predict pathological response and guide therapy personalization in the neoadjuvant setting.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Individualized duration of adjuvant alectinib therapy and rechallenge efficacy in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Emerging Techniques of Translational Research in Immuno-Oncology: A Focus on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Clinical Utility of ctDNA Analysis in Lung Cancer-A Review.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2025Review
- Japan society of clinical oncology position paper on appropriate clinical use of molecular residual disease (MRD) testing.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Prognostic and predictive role of circulating tumor DNA detection in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- The hype around ctDNA guiding an informed perioperative therapeutic strategy in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Deciphering the pseudouridine nucleobase modification in human diseases: From molecular mechanisms to clinical perspectives.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Concerned issues and controversies in perioperative immunotherapy for resectable non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Circulating Tumor cells and multiple indicators combined to identify the risk of poorer prognosis in patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Machine learning model for circulating tumor DNA detection in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2024Article
- Clinical application of ctDNA in early diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.Future oncology (London, England) · 2024Review
- Global trends and research hotspots in perioperative management of lung cancer: a bibliometric analysis from 2004 to 2024.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis reconstructed individual patient data (IPD)-based meta-analysis is aimed to summarize the current findings and comprehensively investigate the predictive value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
methodsPubMed, Cochrane and Embase were searched to include potentially eligible studies. The primary outcomes included progression-free survival (DFS) by ctDNA status at baseline, postoperative, and longitudinal timepoints. The IPD-based survival data was retracted and used in reconstructed IPD-based meta-analysis. Subgroup analysis was implemented based on the baseline characteristics.
resultsTotally, 28 studies were involved, including 15 full-length articles (1686 patients) for IPD-based synthesis and 20 studies for conventional meta-analysis. The IPD-based meta-analysis discovered that patients with positive ctDNA status at the baseline (hazard ratio, HR = 3.73, 95% confidential interval, CI: 2.95-4.72), postoperative (3.96, 2.19-7.16), or longitudinal timepoints (12.33, 8.72-17.43) showed significantly higher risk of recurrence. Patients with persistent ctDNA-negative status had the lowest recurrence rate, and the negative conversion of ctDNA from baseline to postoperative timepoints was correlated with elevated DFS. Subgroup analyses suggested that stage II-III patients with ctDNA-positive status may achieve preferable therapeutic outcomes.
conclusionsPlasm ctDNA monitoring shows excellent clinical significance at the tested timepoints. Perioperative conversion of ctDNA status may indicate the therapeutic effect of radical surgery. Postoperative adjuvant therapy may be determined according to the ctDNA status. TRAIL REGISTRATION: CRD42022304445.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.