Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38012638›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2023

Health workers' adherence to the malaria test, treat and track strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic in malaria high transmission area in Eastern Uganda.

Richard Kabaka Mumali, Charles Okolimong, Tonny Kabuuka, Yovani Moses Lubaale, Ambrose Okibure, Francis Okello, David Soita, Peter Olupot-Olupot

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Richard Kabaka MumaliDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University Faculty of Health Sciences, Mbale, Uganda. mkabakarich@gmail.com.
Charles OkolimongDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University Faculty of Health Sciences, Mbale, Uganda.
Tonny KabuukaNational Agricultural Research Organization (NARO), National Livestock Resources Research Institute (NaLIRRI), P.O. Box 5704, Kampala, Uganda.
Yovani Moses LubaaleDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University Faculty of Health Sciences, Mbale, Uganda.
Ambrose OkibureVarimetrics Group Limited, Mbale, Uganda.
Francis OkelloDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University Faculty of Health Sciences, Mbale, Uganda.
David SoitaDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University Faculty of Health Sciences, Mbale, Uganda.
Peter Olupot-OlupotDepartment of Community and Public Health, Busitema University Faculty of Health Sciences, Mbale, Uganda.
Busitema University · UGMbale Hospital · UGNational Agricultural Research Organisation · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic affected malaria control activities in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) resulting in 690,000 excess deaths in the year 2021. The authors hypothesized that COVID-19 affected the World Health Organization (WHO) Test, Treat and Track (T3) strategy that has been implemented in Uganda since 2010. In this study, health worker's adherence to the T3 strategy during COVID-19 pandemic in Eastern Uganda was studied by assessing their knowledge, skills and practices.

methodsA cross-sectional study utilizing mixed quantitative and qualitative data collections methods was conducted at Mbale Regional Referral Hospital in Eastern Uganda between November and December in 2020. Data were captured on demographics, knowledge, skills and practices for both health workers (HWs) and patients. Quantitative data were analysed using STATA 15.0 and reported as descriptive statistics, proportions and statistical associations. Moreover, qualitative data were collected via key informant interviews (KII) among purposively sampled study participants and analysed thematically using NVIVO software. Ethical approval was obtained prior to the study.

resultsA total of 436 study participants, of whom 103/436 (24%) and 333/436 (76%) were HWs and patients, respectively were studied. Among the HWs with mean age of 34 years (SD = 8.8 years), 81/103 (79%) had good practices, most 63/103 (61%) had good knowledge, and only 11/103 (10.7%) had good skills. Specifically, on the cadres, the laboratory personnel 19/103 (18%) had good knowledge 14/19 (74%) OR: 2.0 (95% CI 0.7-6) and were highly skilled OR: 4.6 (95% CI 1.2-18.1; P < 0.0150) compared to other cadres, respectively. Among the patients whose age ranged 3 months to 80 years (mean 17.8 years) and females 177/333 (53%); a majority 257/333 (77%) were tested, of whom 139/333 (42%) tested positive. Out of the positive cases, 115/333 (35%) were treated and tracked. About 75/333 (23%) were not tested but treated for malaria. Of the 168/239 (70.3%) patients tested, 115/168 (68.5%) were positive and treated, P = 0.0001. The KII revealed low level of In-service training, overwhelming number of patients and stock-out of supplies as a key factor for poor HW adherence to T3 strategy.

conclusionsDuring COVID-19 pandemic period HWs adherence to T3 initiative was low as 27% malaria patients did not receive treatment.

Indexed as

COVID-19MalariaAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantPandemicsUgandaAnti-malarialKnowledgeMalaria diagnostic testMalaria testPracticesSkillsTrack strategyTreat

Identifiers

PMID38012638
PMCPMC10680176
OpenAlexW4389054542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.