Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38012516›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2025

Practice patterns, experiences, and challenges of German oncology health care staff with smoking cessation in patients with cancer: a cross-sectional survey study.

Frederike Bokemeyer, Lisa Lebherz, Carsten Bokemeyer, Jeroen W G Derksen, Holger Schulz, Christiane Bleich

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Frederike BokemeyerDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. f.bokemeyer@uke.de.
Lisa LebherzDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Carsten BokemeyerCenter for Oncology, II. Medical Clinic and Polyclinic, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Jeroen W G DerksenDivision Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Epidemiology and Health Economics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584, CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Holger Schulz *Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Christiane Bleich *Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOften, cancer patients do not receive education about the negative consequences of smoking on the treatment outcome. To support cancer patients in the process of smoking cessation, it is essential to involve oncology staff. This study aims to learn about the experiences and attitudes from the point of view of oncology staff and, thus, how a smoking intervention should be designed. The study aims to engage all oncology staff due to the unclear responsibility for providing smoking cessation education, support, and motivating cancer patients to quit smoking.

methodsN = 354 German oncology staff (oncologists, nurses, psycho-oncologists, others) filled out a 5-point Likert scale-based questionnaire regarding practices, potential barriers, and attitudes towards smoking cessation between October 2021 and June 2022. The questionnaire was developed by Derksen et al. (2020), translated and slightly modified for the use of this study. It was distributed to all leading oncology staff in our Cancer Center Network with a request to share with all oncology staff. Flyers were also handed out in all oncology wards and outpatient clinics in the same Cancer Center Network.

resultsMost oncology staff ask cancer patients about their current smoking status (curative, M = 2.27; SD = 1.59; palliative, M = 2.90; SD = 1.83), but they rarely treat or refer patients for a smoking cessation intervention (curative, M = 4.78; SD = 1.20; palliative, M = 4.99; SD = 1.06). Smoking behavior of curative cancer patients is addressed more than that of palliative cancer patients (d =  - 37). Regression analyses of key dependent variables showed that profession, setting, and the belief that continued smoking affects treatment outcome explained the variance of asking patients if they smoke, advising to stop smoking and lack of time (without profession).

conclusionInvolving oncology staff in motivating cancer patients who smoke to quit and referring them to smoking cessation services should take the different attitudes and knowledge of the staff into account to improve treatment that supports tobacco cessation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cancer patients have special needs when it comes to a cessation program. In the long term, survivors will benefit from tailored smoking cessation education and services provided by oncology staff to help them quit smoking after a cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelMedical OncologyNeoplasmsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Smoking CessationAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesCancerHealth service researchHealth staffPsycho-oncologySmoking cessationSmoking relapse

Identifiers

PMID38012516
PMCPMC11926055
OpenAlexW4389081973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.