Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38012448›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024

Delphi consensus project on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted surgery-outcomes from an international multidisciplinary panel.

Anne-Claire Berrens, Matthijs Scheltema, Tobias Maurer, Ken Hermann, Freddie C Hamdy, Sophie Knipper, Paolo Dell'Oglio, Elio Mazzone, Hilda A de Barros, Jonathan M Sorger and 10 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Actionable Feedback on Signal-to-Background Ratios During Drop-in Radioguided Surgery.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Lessons learned in application driven imaging agent design for image-guided surgery.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Anne-Claire BerrensDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.berrens@nki.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-3328-384X
Matthijs ScheltemaDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tobias MaurerMartini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Ken HermannDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.
Freddie C HamdyNuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sophie KnipperDepartment of Urology, Vivantes Klinikum Am Urban, Berlin, Germany.
Paolo Dell'OglioDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elio MazzoneUnit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Hilda A de BarrosDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jonathan M SorgerIntuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA.
Matthias N van OosteromDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Philip D StrickerDepartment of Urology, St Vincents Hospital Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Pim J van LeeuwenDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Daphne D D RietbergenDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Renato A Valdes OlmosInterventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sergi Vidal-SicartDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Peter R CarrollDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Tessa BuckleDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk G van der PoelDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fijs W B van LeeuwenDepartment of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 2022-PPS-14852Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen TTW BGT16141
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProstate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is increasingly considered as a molecular target to achieve precision surgery for prostate cancer. A Delphi consensus was conducted to explore expert views in this emerging field and to identify knowledge and evidence gaps as well as unmet research needs that may help change practice and improve oncological outcomes for patients.

methodsOne hundred and five statements (scored by a 9-point Likert scale) were distributed through SurveyMonkey®. Following evaluation, a consecutive second round was performed to evaluate consensus (16 statements; 89% response rate). Consensus was defined using the disagreement index, assessed by the research and development project/University of California, Los Angeles appropriateness method.

resultsEighty-six panel participants (72.1% clinician, 8.1% industry, 15.1% scientists, and 4.7% other) participated, most with a urological background (57.0%), followed by nuclear medicine (22.1%). Consensus was obtained on the following: (1) The diagnostic PSMA-ligand PET/CT should ideally be taken < 1 month before surgery, 1-3 months is acceptable; (2) a 16-20-h interval between injection of the tracer and surgery seems to be preferred; (3) PSMA targeting is most valuable for identification of nodal metastases; (4) gamma, fluorescence, and hybrid imaging are the preferred guidance technologies; and (5) randomized controlled clinical trials are required to define oncological value. Regarding surgical margin assessment, the view on the value of PSMA-targeted surgery was neutral or inconclusive. A high rate of "cannot answer" responses indicates further study is necessary to address knowledge gaps (e.g., Cerenkov or beta-emissions).

conclusionsThis Delphi consensus provides guidance for clinicians and researchers that implement or develop PSMA-targeted surgery technologies. Ultimately, however, the consensus should be backed by randomized clinical trial data before it may be implemented within the guidelines.

Indexed as

Antigens, SurfaceDelphi TechniqueGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleMolecular Targeted TherapyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAntigens, SurfaceFOLH1 protein, humanGlutamate Carboxypeptidase IIDelphi consensusPanel meetingProstate cancerProstate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)Radioguided surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.