ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2024
Screening for prostate cancer in a city in Japan: age-specific prostate-specific antigen cutoff thresholds.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association Between Occupation and Cancer Risk: A Large-scale Case-control Study in Japan.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2026Article
- Initial outcomes of a municipality-led prostate cancer screening program: Analysis of the osaka city system in a community clinic setting.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOlder men have higher prostate-specific antigen levels than younger men. However, the current Japanese Urological Association guidelines recommend secondary screening at a cutoff value of 4.0 ng/mL, even in older men. Here, we reexamined the cutoffs for older men using a prostate screening cohort in Japan and first performed an analysis to determine the indication cutoffs for detecting positive biopsies.
methodsData from 68,566 prostate cancer screenings in the city in 2018 were combined with cancer registration data. The optimal prostate-specific antigen levels to predict prostate cancer in different age groups were calculated using receiver operating characteristic curves after determining whether a cancer was registered within one year of screening.
resultsAt the conventional prostate-specific antigen threshold of 4.0 ng/mL, the sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value were 94.9%, 91.7%, and 91.7%, respectively. The optimal prostate-specific antigen cutoff values for patients aged 50-59 years, 60-69 years, 70-79 years, and over 80 years were 3.900 ng/mL, 4.014 ng/mL, 4.080 ng/mL, and 4.780 ng/mL, respectively.
conclusionsThe sensitivity and specificity of prostate cancer screening in the city were high, indicating a highly accurate screening. The prostate-specific antigen threshold was 4.78 ng/mL in patients older than 80 years. A higher prostate-specific antigen threshold may be useful in men over 80 years of age to avoid excess biopsy and reduce costs. Our results suggest that the current Japanese method of using PSA 4.0 ng/mL as a cutoff regardless of age may not be preferable for older men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.