Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38012393›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2023

Potential reasons for failure and recurrence in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm.

Takuro Inoue, Yukihiro Goto, Yasuaki Inoue, Peter Adidharma, Mustaqim Prasetya, Takanori Fukushima

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cyberknife radiosurgery for hemifacial spasm.Surgical neurology international · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Takuro InoueDepartment of Neurosurgery, Koto Memorial Hospital, Higashiomi, Shiga, Japan. takuro39@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5639-9864
Yukihiro GotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Koto Memorial Hospital, Higashiomi, Shiga, Japan.
Yasuaki InoueDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nadogaya Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Peter AdidharmaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Brain Center Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Mustaqim PrasetyaDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Brain Center Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Takanori FukushimaDivision of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
National Brain Centre · IDDuke Medical Center · USKoga Hospital · JPMemorial Hospital of South Bend · USNadogaya Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo examine the factors contributing to persistent and recurrent hemifacial spasms (HFS) following a microvascular decompression (MVD) procedure and to suggest technical improvements to prevent such failures.

methodsA retrospective review was conducted on fifty-two cases of repeat surgery. The extent of the previous craniotomy and the location of neurovascular compression (NVC) were investigated. The operative findings were categorized into two groups: "Missing Compression" and "Teflon Contact". The analysis included long-term outcomes and operative complications after repeat MVD procedures.

resultsMissing compression was identified in 29 patients (56%), while Teflon contact was observed in 23 patients (44%). Patients with missing compression were more likely to experience improper craniotomy (66%) compared to those with Teflon contact (48%). Medially located NVC was a frequent finding in both groups, mainly due to compression by the anterior inferior cerebellar artery. In the missing compression group, during the repeat MVD, Teflon sling retraction was utilized in 79% of cases, while in the Teflon contact group, the most common procedure involved removing the Teflon in contact (65%). After the repeat MVD procedure, immediate spasm relief was achieved in 42 patients (81%), with six (12%) experiencing delayed relief. After a median follow-up of 54 months, 96% of patients were free from spasms. Delayed facial palsy, facial weakness, and hearing impairment were more frequently observed in the Teflon contact group.

conclusionsA proper craniotomy that provides adequate exposure around the REZ is crucial to prevent missing the culprit vessel during the initial MVD procedure. Teflon contact on the REZ should be avoided, as it poses a potential risk of procedure failure and recurrence.

Indexed as

Facial ParalysisHemifacial SpasmMicrovascular Decompression SurgeryHumansPolytetrafluoroethyleneRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomePolytetrafluoroethyleneHemifacial spasmInferior retrosigmoid pointMicrovascular DecompressionRecurrenceRe-explorationRepeat surgeryRetrosigmoid approach

Identifiers

PMID38012393
OpenAlexW4389082384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.