Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38012383›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2024

Unlocking hidden potential: advancements, approaches, and obstacles in repurposing drugs for cancer therapy.

Freya R Weth, Georgia B Hoggarth, Anya F Weth, Erin Paterson, Madeleine P J White, Swee T Tan, Lifeng Peng, Clint Gray

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
31.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Revisiting the Fight AgainstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Freya R WethGillies McIndoe Research Institute, Newtown, Wellington, 6021, New Zealand.
Georgia B HoggarthGillies McIndoe Research Institute, Newtown, Wellington, 6021, New Zealand.
Anya F WethGillies McIndoe Research Institute, Newtown, Wellington, 6021, New Zealand.
Erin PatersonGillies McIndoe Research Institute, Newtown, Wellington, 6021, New Zealand.
Madeleine P J WhiteGillies McIndoe Research Institute, Newtown, Wellington, 6021, New Zealand.
Swee T TanGillies McIndoe Research Institute, Newtown, Wellington, 6021, New Zealand.
Lifeng PengCentre for Biodiscovery and School of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn, Wellington, 6021, New Zealand.
Clint GrayGillies McIndoe Research Institute, Newtown, Wellington, 6021, New Zealand. clint.gray@gmri.org.nz.ORCID 0000-0001-9744-6356
Gillies McIndoe Research Institute · NZVictoria University of Wellington · NZThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High rates of failure, exorbitant costs, and the sluggish pace of new drug discovery and development have led to a growing interest in repurposing "old" drugs to treat both common and rare diseases, particularly cancer. Cancer, a complex and heterogeneous disease, often necessitates a combination of different treatment modalities to achieve optimal outcomes. The intrinsic polygenicity of cancer, intricate biological signalling networks, and feedback loops make the inhibition of a single target frequently insufficient for achieving the desired therapeutic impact. As a result, addressing these complex or "smart" malignancies demands equally sophisticated treatment strategies. Combinatory treatments that target the multifaceted oncogenic signalling network hold immense promise. Repurposed drugs offer a potential solution to this challenge, harnessing known compounds for new indications. By avoiding the prohibitive costs and long development timelines associated with novel cancer drugs, this approach holds the potential to usher in more effective, efficient, and cost-effective cancer treatments. The pursuit of combinatory therapies through drug repurposing may hold the key to achieving superior outcomes for cancer patients. However, drug repurposing faces significant commercial, technological and regulatory challenges that need to be addressed. This review explores the diverse approaches employed in drug repurposing, delves into the challenges faced by the drug repurposing community, and presents innovative solutions to overcome these obstacles. By emphasising the significance of combinatory treatments within the context of drug repurposing, we aim to unlock the full potential of this approach for enhancing cancer therapy. The positive aspects of drug repurposing in oncology are underscored here; encompassing personalized treatment, accelerated development, market opportunities for shelved drugs, cancer prevention, expanded patient reach, improved patient access, multi-partner collaborations, increased likelihood of approval, reduced costs, and enhanced combination therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDrug RepositioningHumansMedical OncologyAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID38012383
PMCPMC10912636
OpenAlexW4389042124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.