ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2024
The effects of breast density on the benefits of mammograms with adjunctive ultrasonography in breast screening.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveVarious efforts have been made to improve the accuracy of breast cancer screening. This study aimed to report differences in the contribution of ultrasonography to cancer screening assessments of dense and non-dense breasts.
methodsThe participants in this study were 29,640 Japanese women in their 40 s who underwent breast cancer screening at the Iwate Cancer Society between 2018 and 2021. This included women who chose mammography alone or mammography with adjunctive ultrasonography (overall assessment). They were classified into two groups according to the breast density in mammography: dense breasts and non-dense breasts. Recall rate, breast cancer detection rate, and positive predictive value of the two screening-type groups were evaluated for each breast density group.
resultsOf the 29,640 women analyzed, 18,861 (63.6%) underwent mammography alone and 10,779 (36.3%) were by overall assessments. The number of women recalled was higher in the overall assessment group than in the mammography-alone group (2.9% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.01). The proportion of women in whom breast cancer was detected was higher in the overall assessment group than in the mammography-alone group (0.31% [n = 33] vs. 0.15% [n = 28], p < 0.01). For non-dense breasts, there were no significant differences in either the recall rate or the breast cancer detection rate between those who underwent mammography alone and those who underwent overall assessment. Conversely, for dense breasts, the recall rate after mammography alone was lower than that after overall assessment (1.8% vs. 3.8%, p < 0.01), and the breast cancer detection rate was higher after overall assessment than after mammography alone (0.40% vs. 0.18%, p < 0.01).
conclusionWe found the benefits of adjunctive ultrasonography with mammography to differ depending on breast density. This could be used to tailor the selection of screening modalities to individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.