Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38012296›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2024

Targeting synapse function and loss for treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

Borislav Dejanovic, Morgan Sheng, Jesse E Hanson

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
22.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Transcriptomic and Neuroimaging Decoding of Brain-Immune Crosstalk in Thyroid Eye Disease.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Borislav DejanovicVigil Neuroscience, Cambridge, MA, USA. bdejanovic@vigilneuro.com.
Morgan ShengBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8703-5366
Jesse E HansonDepartment of Neuroscience, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA. hanson.jesse@gene.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3059-5132
Broad Institute · USDigital Video (Italy) · ITGene Therapy Laboratory · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synapse dysfunction and loss are hallmarks of neurodegenerative diseases that correlate with cognitive decline. However, the mechanisms and therapeutic strategies to prevent or reverse synaptic damage remain elusive. In this Review, we discuss recent advances in understanding the molecular and cellular pathways that impair synapses in neurodegenerative diseases, including the effects of protein aggregation and neuroinflammation. We also highlight emerging therapeutic approaches that aim to restore synaptic function and integrity, such as enhancing synaptic plasticity, preventing synaptotoxicity, modulating neuronal network activity and targeting immune signalling. We discuss the preclinical and clinical evidence for each strategy, as well as the challenges and opportunities for developing effective synapse-targeting therapeutics for neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseNeurodegenerative DiseasesHumansNeuronal PlasticitySignal TransductionSynapses

Identifiers

PMID38012296
OpenAlexW4389048048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.