Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38012290›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2024

Unveiling decomposition dynamics: leveraging 3D models for advanced forensic analysis.

Paige Tynan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Paige TynanDepartment of Applied Science, Wrexham University, Plas Coch Campus Mold Road, Wrexham, LL11 2AW, UK. Paige.tynan@glyndwr.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1349-8314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forensic taphonomy, the study of post-mortem processes, is pivotal in modern forensic science. This short communication illuminates limitations in traditional 2D imaging, specifically digital photographs, within forensic taphonomy, and highlights the vast potential of 3D modeling techniques. Drawing from a recent study in Hawaii's tropical savanna, we unveil disparities between real-time observations and 2D photographs when assessing decomposition, emphasizing the importance of scoring method selection and the need to scrutinize 2D imaging's accuracy in forensic taphonomy. Conversely, 3D modeling techniques, an emerging powerhouse in forensic science, offer multidimensional data, including volume, surface area, and spatial relationships, allowing for comprehensive and precise representation of decomposition dynamics. Despite concerns about texture quality, 3D models yield objective data amenable to analysis by multiple experts, thus minimizing subjectivity and augmenting the reliability of forensic assessments. The potential for 3D modeling to bridge the gap between 2D imaging and real-time decomposition requires tailored methodologies. Future research should focus on standardizing protocols and fostering collaboration among forensic experts, technologists, and researchers to unleash 3D technology's full potential in advancing forensic taphonomy.

Indexed as

Forensic SciencesPostmortem ChangesAutopsyHumansPhotographyReproducibility of Results3D modelsDecompositionForensic imagingForensic taphonomyTotal body score

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.