Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38012260›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

High-altitude and low-altitude adapted chicken gut-microbes have different functional diversity.

Neha Rani Bhagat, Priyanka Chauhan, Pratibha Verma, Aradhana Mishra, Vijay K Bharti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Neha Rani BhagatDRDO-Defence Institute of High-Altitude Research (DIHAR), Ministry of Defence, Leh, 194101, UT Ladakh, India.
Priyanka ChauhanAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201002, India.
Pratibha VermaAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201002, India.
Aradhana MishraDivision of Microbial Technology, CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, 226001, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vijay K BhartiDRDO-Defence Institute of High-Altitude Research (DIHAR), Ministry of Defence, Leh, 194101, UT Ladakh, India. vijaykbharti@rediffmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6072-8704
Defence Institute of High Altitude Research · INNational Botanical Research Institute · INGeneral Electric (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, there has been considerable interest in the functions of gut microbiota in broiler chickens in relation to their use as feed additives. However, the gut-microbiota of chickens reared at different altitudes are not well documented for their potential role in adapting to prevailing conditions and functional changes. In this context, the present study investigates the functional diversity of gut-microbes in high-altitude (HACh) and low-altitude adapted chickens (LACh), assessing their substrate utilization profile through Biolog Ecoplates technology. This will help in the identification of potential microbes or their synthesized metabolites, which could be beneficial for the host or industrial applications. Results revealed that among the 31 different types of studied substrates, only polymers, carbohydrates, carboxylic acids, and amine-based substrates utilization varied significantly (p < 0.05) among the chickens reared at two different altitudes where gut-microbes of LACh utilized a broad range of substrates than the HACh. Further, diversity indices (Shannon and MacIntosh) analysis in LACh samples showed significant (p < 0.05) higher richness and evenness of microbes as compared to the HACh samples. However, no significant difference was observed in the Simpson diversity index in gut microbes of lowversus high-altitude chickens. In addition, the Principal Component Analysis elucidated variation in substrate preferences of gut-microbes, where 13 and 8 carbon substrates were found to constitute PC1 and PC2, respectively, where γ-aminobutyric acid, D-glucosaminic acid, i-erythritol and tween 40 were the most relevant substrates that had a major effect on PC1, however, alpha-ketobutyric acid and glycyl-L-glutamic acid affected PC2. Hence, this study concludes that the gut-microbes of high and low-altitudes adapted chickens use different carbon substrates so that they could play a vital role in the health and immunity of an animal host based on their geographical location. Consequently, this study substantiates the difference in the substrate utilization and functional diversity of the microbial flora in chickens reared at high and low altitudes due to altitudinal changes.

Indexed as

AltitudeGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsCarbonChickensGlutamic AcidCarbonGlutamic Acid

Identifiers

PMID38012260
PMCPMC10682461
OpenAlexW4389043149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.