ArticleScientific reports2023
Application of machine learning models in the capacity prediction of RCFST columns.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- An optimized machine learning approach for reliable design of hybrid FRP-steel-concrete tubular columns.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An Interpretable Ensemble Machine Learning Framework for Predicting the Ultimate Flexural Capacity of BFRP-Reinforced Concrete Beams.Polymers · 2026Article
- Comparative Study of Machine Learning for Predicting Compressive Strength in Oyster Shell Cementitious Composites.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Hydraulic Performance Modeling of Inclined Double Cutoff Walls Beneath Hydraulic Structures Using Optimized Ensemble Machine Learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting flexural strength of hybrid FRP-steel reinforced beams using symbolic regression and ML techniques.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prediction of ultimate strength and strain in FRP wrapped oval shaped concrete columns using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prediction of buckling damage of steel equal angle structural members using hybrid machine learning techniques.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Symbolic regression for strength prediction of eccentrically loaded concrete-filled steel tubular columns.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Circular rubber aggregate CFST stub columns under axial compression: prediction and reliability analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- STM-based symbolic regression for strength prediction of RC deep beams and corbels.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prediction of the axial compression capacity of stub CFST columns using machine learning techniques.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rectangular concrete-filled steel tubular (RCFST) columns are widely used in structural engineering due to their excellent load-carrying capacity and ductility. However, existing design equations often yield different design results for the same column properties, leading to uncertainty for engineering designers. Furthermore, basic regression analysis fails to precisely forecast the complicated relation between the column properties and its compressive strength. To overcome these challenges, this study suggests two machine learning (ML) models, including the Gaussian process (GPR) and the extreme gradient boosting model (XGBoost). These models employ a range of input variables, such as the geometric and material properties of RCFST columns, to estimate their strength. The models are trained and evaluated based on two datasets consisting of 958 axially loaded RCFST columns and 405 eccentrically loaded RCFST columns. In addition, a unitless output variable, termed the strength index, is introduced to enhance model performance. From evolution metrics, the GPR model emerged as the most accurate and reliable model, with nearly 99% of specimens with less than 20% error. In addition, the prediction results of ML models were compared with the predictions of two existing standard codes and different ML studies. The results indicated that the developed ML models achieved notable enhancement in prediction accuracy. In addition, the Shapley additive interpretation (SHAP) technique is employed for feature analysis. The feature analysis results reveal that the column length and load end-eccentricity parameters negatively impact compressive strength.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.