ArticleNPJ digital medicine2023
Causal inference using observational intensive care unit data: a scoping review and recommendations for future practice.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of software vs. cognitive-based fusion-targeted biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis.BJUI compass · 2026Article
- Choosing Covariate Balancing Methods for Causal Inference: Practical Insights From a Simulation Study.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of post-transfusion hemoglobin levels on survival in critically Ill patients: a machine learning-based causal inference analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Protocol for a multicentre target trial emulation comparing ketamine and propofol in critically ill adults undergoing emergency intubation.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Design and Implementation of Observational Studies Emulating a Target Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- A causal inference framework to compare the effectiveness of life-sustaining ICU therapies-using the example of cancer patients with sepsis.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- AI-driven radiogenomics in gynecologic oncology: from radiological digital biopsy to a new paradigm in precision therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Integration, challenges, and future of artificial intelligence in critical care medicine: comprehensive applications from predictive models to clinical integration.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Environment and Human Health: Progress, Opportunities and Challenges.Current environmental health reports · 2025Review
- Opportunities, challenges and future perspectives for target trial emulation in critical care clinical research.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Review
- Liberal or restrictive transfusion for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients: a target trial emulation using the OBLEX study data.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Observational
- Switching from controlled to assisted mechanical ventilation: a multi-center retrospective study (SWITCH).Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Causal clarity in statistical software.International journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Unveiling the conceptual and intellectual map of care bundle research in ICUs: Trends, key issues, and collaborative networks.Nursing in critical care · 2025Article
- Article
- The future of artificial intelligence in intensive care: moving from predictive to actionable AI.Intensive care medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This scoping review focuses on the essential role of models for causal inference in shaping actionable artificial intelligence (AI) designed to aid clinicians in decision-making. The objective was to identify and evaluate the reporting quality of studies introducing models for causal inference in intensive care units (ICUs), and to provide recommendations to improve the future landscape of research practices in this domain. To achieve this, we searched various databases including Embase, MEDLINE ALL, Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar, medRxiv, bioRxiv, arXiv, and the ACM Digital Library. Studies involving models for causal inference addressing time-varying treatments in the adult ICU were reviewed. Data extraction encompassed the study settings and methodologies applied. Furthermore, we assessed reporting quality of target trial components (i.e., eligibility criteria, treatment strategies, follow-up period, outcome, and analysis plan) and main causal assumptions (i.e., conditional exchangeability, positivity, and consistency). Among the 2184 titles screened, 79 studies met the inclusion criteria. The methodologies used were G methods (61%) and reinforcement learning methods (39%). Studies considered both static (51%) and dynamic treatment regimes (49%). Only 30 (38%) of the studies reported all five target trial components, and only seven (9%) studies mentioned all three causal assumptions. To achieve actionable AI in the ICU, we advocate careful consideration of the causal question of interest, describing this research question as a target trial emulation, usage of appropriate causal inference methods, and acknowledgement (and examination of potential violations of) the causal assumptions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.