Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38012195›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Robust in-vehicle heartbeat detection using multimodal signal fusion.

Joana M Warnecke, Joan Lasenby, Thomas M Deserno

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joana M WarneckePeter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, 38106, Brunswick, Germany. joana.warnecke@plri.de.
Joan LasenbyDepartment of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, UK.
Thomas M DesernoPeter L. Reichertz Institute for Medical Informatics of TU Braunschweig and Hannover Medical School, 38106, Brunswick, Germany.

Funding

Lower Saxony "Vorab" of the Volkswagen Foundation and Center for Digital Innovations ZN3491
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A medical check-up during driving enables the early detection of diseases. Heartbeat irregularities indicate possible cardiovascular diseases, which can be determined with continuous health monitoring. Therefore, we develop a redundant sensor system based on electrocardiography (ECG) and photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors attached to the steering wheel, a red, green, and blue (RGB) camera behind the steering wheel. For the video, we integrate the face recognition engine SeetaFace to detect landmarks of face segments continuously. Based on the green channel, we derive colour changes and, subsequently, the heartbeat. We record the ECG, PPG, video, and reference ECG with body electrodes of 19 volunteers during different driving scenarios, each lasting 15 min: city, highway, and countryside. We combine early, signal-based late, and sensor-based late fusion with a hybrid convolutional neural network (CNN) and integrated majority voting to deliver the final heartbeats that we compare to the reference ECG. Based on the measured and the reference heartbeat positions, the usable time was 51.75%, 58.62%, and 55.96% for the driving scenarios city, highway, and countryside, respectively, with the hybrid algorithm and combination of ECG and PPG. In conclusion, the findings suggest that approximately half the driving time can be utilised for in-vehicle heartbeat monitoring.

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHeart RateHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPhotoplethysmography

Identifiers

PMID38012195
PMCPMC10682004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.