ArticleScientific reports2023
Robust in-vehicle heartbeat detection using multimodal signal fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rationale and design of the AutoHealth study: prospective clinical validation of continuous multimodal in-vehicle health monitoring in real-world mobility.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Research on cross-dataset cardiac signal domain generalization and feature interpretability.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cardiac Monitoring with Textile Capacitive Electrodes in Driving Applications: Characterization of Signal Quality and RR Duration Accuracy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Channel attention pyramid network for remote physiological measurement.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Vehicle Driver Health Monitoring Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Robust in-vehicle respiratory rate detection using multimodal signal fusion.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A medical check-up during driving enables the early detection of diseases. Heartbeat irregularities indicate possible cardiovascular diseases, which can be determined with continuous health monitoring. Therefore, we develop a redundant sensor system based on electrocardiography (ECG) and photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors attached to the steering wheel, a red, green, and blue (RGB) camera behind the steering wheel. For the video, we integrate the face recognition engine SeetaFace to detect landmarks of face segments continuously. Based on the green channel, we derive colour changes and, subsequently, the heartbeat. We record the ECG, PPG, video, and reference ECG with body electrodes of 19 volunteers during different driving scenarios, each lasting 15 min: city, highway, and countryside. We combine early, signal-based late, and sensor-based late fusion with a hybrid convolutional neural network (CNN) and integrated majority voting to deliver the final heartbeats that we compare to the reference ECG. Based on the measured and the reference heartbeat positions, the usable time was 51.75%, 58.62%, and 55.96% for the driving scenarios city, highway, and countryside, respectively, with the hybrid algorithm and combination of ECG and PPG. In conclusion, the findings suggest that approximately half the driving time can be utilised for in-vehicle heartbeat monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.