ArticleAnnals of family medicine
Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in US Family Medicine Residency Programs.
Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Celebrating Family Medicine at the National Academy of Medicine, 2025.Annals of family medicine · 2026Article
- Outcomes from a procedural abortion training program for providers in underserved areas: findings from a four-year evaluation.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Overturning Roe v. Wade and pre-medical students' views and medical school choices.Medical education online · 2025Article
- "I Went Into This Field to Empower Other People, and I Feel Like I Failed": Residents Experience Moral Distress Post-Journal of graduate medical education · 2024Article
- Abortion Training in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A National Survey of Program Directors 5 Months After the Dobbs Decision.Family medicine · 2024Article
- Reproductive Health Training in 2026 and Beyond: Adapting Abortion Education in a Post-Dobbs Era.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In June 2022, the US Supreme Court overturned
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.