Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38011995›Full record

ArticleOpen heart2023

Machine learning facilitates the prediction of long-term mortality in patients with tricuspid regurgitation.

Brototo Deb, Christopher Scott, Sorin V Pislaru, Vuyisile T Nkomo, Garvan Christopher Kane, Mohamad Alkhouli, Juan A Crestanello, Adelaide Arruda-Olson, Patricia A Pellikka, Vidhu Anand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Structural Heart Disease.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Etiology of tricuspid regurgitation and mortality: a multicenter cohort study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brototo DebInternal Medicine, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8800-0002
Christopher ScottBiostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1340-0647
Sorin V PislaruCardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Vuyisile T NkomoCardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Garvan Christopher KaneCardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Mohamad AlkhouliCardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3847-0959
Juan A CrestanelloCardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Adelaide Arruda-OlsonCardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Patricia A PellikkaCardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Vidhu AnandCardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA anand.vidhu@mayo.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a prevalent valve disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to apply machine learning (ML) to assess risk stratification in patients with ≥moderate TR.

methodsPatients with ≥moderate TR on echocardiogram between January 2005 and December 2016 were retrospectively included. We used 70% of data to train ML-based survival models including 27 clinical and echocardiographic features to predict mortality over a 3-year period on an independent test set (30%). To account for differences in baseline comorbidities, prediction was performed in groups stratified by increasing Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Permutation feature importance was calculated using the best-performing model separately in these groups.

resultsOf 13 312 patients, mean age 72 ± 13 years and 7406 (55%) women, 7409 (56%) had moderate, 2646 (20%) had moderate-severe and 3257 (24%) had severe TR. The overall performance for 1-year mortality by 3 ML models was good, c-statistic 0.74-0.75. Interestingly, performance varied between CCI groups, (c-statistic = 0.774 in lowest CCI group and 0.661 in highest CCI group). The performance decreased over 3-year follow-up (average c-index 0.78). Furthermore, the top 10 features contributing to these predictions varied slightly with the CCI group, the top features included heart rate, right ventricular systolic pressure, blood pressure, diuretic use and age.

conclusionsMachine learning of common clinical and echocardiographic features can evaluate mortality risk in patients with TR. Further refinement of models and validation in prospective studies are needed before incorporation into the clinical practice.

Indexed as

Tricuspid Valve InsufficiencyAgedAged, 80 and overEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEchocardiographyElectronic Health RecordsTranslational Medical ResearchTricuspid Valve Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID38011995
PMCPMC10685925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.