Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38011973›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Optimising HIV care using information obtained from PROMs: protocol for an observational study.

Kevin Moody, Pythia T Nieuwkerk, Maarten Bedert, Jeannine F Nellen, Annouschka Weijsenfeld, Kim C E Sigaloff, Laura Laan, Claire Bruins, Hedy van Oers, Lotte Haverman and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin MoodyInfectious Diseases and Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands k.moody@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-0442-7680
Pythia T NieuwkerkAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maarten BedertInfectious Diseases and Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeannine F NellenInfectious Diseases and Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Annouschka WeijsenfeldInfectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kim C E SigaloffInfectious Diseases and Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Laura LaanInfectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Claire BruinsInfectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hedy van OersAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lotte HavermanAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Suzanne E GeerlingsInfectious Diseases and Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marc Van der ValkInfectious Diseases and Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NLStichting HIV Monitoring · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSuccessful antiviral therapy has transformed HIV infection into a chronic condition, where optimising quality of life (QoL) has become essential for successful lifelong treatment. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can signal potential physical and mental health problems related to QoL. This study aims to determine whether PROMs in routine clinical care improve quality of care as experienced by people with HIV (PWH). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We report the protocol of a multicentre longitudinal cohort studying PWH at Amsterdam University Medical Centres in the Netherlands. PROMs are offered annually to patients via the patient portal of the electronic health record. Domains include anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbances, social isolation, physical functioning, stigma, post-traumatic stress disorder, adherence, drug and alcohol use and screening questions for sexual health and issues related to finances, housing and migration status. Our intervention comprises (1) patients' completion of PROMs, (2) discussion of PROMs scores during annual consultations and (3) documentation of follow-up actions in an individualised care plan, if indicated. The primary endpoint will be patient-experienced quality of care, measured by the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care, Short Form (PACIC-S). Patients will provide measurements at baseline, year 1 and year 2. We will explore change over time in PACIC-S and PROMs scores and examine the sociodemographical and HIV-specific characteristics of subgroups of patients who participated in all or only part of the intervention to ascertain whether benefit has been achieved from our intervention in all subgroups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Patients provide consent for the analysis of data collected as part of routine clinical care to the AIDS Therapy Evaluation in the Netherlands study (ATHENA) cohort through mechanisms described in Boender

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSleep Wake DisordersAnxietyAnxiety DisordersHumansObservational Studies as TopicPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeHIV and AIDSPatient-Centred CarePatient-Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality in healthcareQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID38011973
PMCPMC10685965
OpenAlexW4389060487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.