Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38011801›Full record

ArticleInflammatory bowel diseases2024

Early Intestinal Ultrasound Predicts Clinical and Endoscopic Treatment Response and Demonstrates Drug-Specific Kinetics in Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

Floris A de Voogd, Steven J Bots, Elsa A van Wassenaer, Maria de Jong, Maarten J Pruijt, Geert R D'Haens, Krisztina B Gecse

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A practical approach to positioning therapies in ulcerative colitis.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Floris A de VoogdDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4058-252X
Steven J BotsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Elsa A van WassenaerPaediatric Gastroenterology, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Maria de JongDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Maarten J PruijtDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Geert R D'HaensDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Krisztina B GecseDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLEmma Kinderziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntestinal ultrasound (IUS) is an emerging modality in monitoring disease activity in ulcerative colitis (UC). Here, we aimed to identify early IUS predictors of treatment response as evaluated by endoscopy and assessed the kinetics of IUS changes.

methodsThis prospective, longitudinal study included UC patients with endoscopic disease activity (endoscopic Mayo score [EMS] ≥2) starting anti-inflammatory treatment. Clinical scores, biochemical parameters and IUS were assessed at baseline (W0), at week 2 (W2), at W6(W6), and at the time of second endoscopy (W8-W26). Per colonic segment, endoscopic remission (EMS = 0), improvement (EMS ≤1), response (decrease in EMS ≥1), and clinical remission (Lichtiger score ≤3) were assessed and correlated with common IUS parameters. Additionally, drug-specific responsiveness of bowel wall thickness (BWT) was assessed.

resultsA total of 51 patients were included and followed, and 33 patients underwent second endoscopy. BWT was lower from W6 onward for patients reaching endoscopic improvement (3.0 ± 1.2 mm vs 4.1 ± 1.3 mm; P = .026), remission (2.5 ± 1.2 mm vs 4.1 ± 1.1 mm; P = .002), and clinical remission (3.01 ± 1.34 mm vs 3.85 ± 1.20 mm; P = .035). Decrease in BWT was more pronounced in endoscopic responders (-40 ± 25% vs -4 ± 28%; P = .001) at W8 to W26. At W6, BWT ≤3.0 mm (odds ratio [OR], 25.13; 95% confidence interval, 2.01-3.14; P = .012) and color Doppler signal (OR, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.88; P = .026) predicted endoscopic remission and improvement, respectively. Submucosal layer thickness at W6 predicted endoscopic remission (OR, 0.09; P = .018) and improvement (OR, 0.14; P = .02). Furthermore, BWT decreased significantly at W2 for infliximab and tofacitinib and at W6 for vedolizumab.

conclusionsBWT and color Doppler signal predicted endoscopic targets already after 6 weeks of treatment and response was drug specific. IUS allows close monitoring of treatment in UC and is a surrogate marker of endoscopy.

Indexed as

Colitis, UlcerativeSeverity of Illness IndexUltrasonographyAdultColonoscopyFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRemission InductionTreatment OutcomeGastrointestinal Agentsintestinal ultrasoundtreatment responseulcerative colitis

Identifiers

PMID38011801
PMCPMC11532594
OpenAlexW4389094678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.