Survival after living donor liver transplantation versus best supportive care in patients with end-stage liver disease with various MELD-Na scores: retrospective cohort study.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Artificial intelligence-assisted prediction of bile duct bifurcation site in pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy: a retrospective feasibility study.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026
   Article
2. Role of sarcopenia in complex abdominal wall surgery: does it increase postoperative complications and mortality?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
   Article
3. Survival after live donor versus deceased donor liver transplantation: propensity score-matched study.BJS open · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as