ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
deepFPlearn +: enhancing toxicity prediction across the chemical universe using graph neural networks.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Cross-Attentive Graph-Based Framework for Predicting In Vivo Endocrine Disruptors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for precision oncology from phenotyping and drug discovery to clinical translation.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- MLinvitroTox reloaded for high-throughput hazard-based prioritization of high-resolution mass spectrometry data.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Progress, applications, and challenges in high-throughput effect-directed analysis for toxicity driver identification - is it time for HT-EDA?Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
summarySophisticated approaches for the in silico prediction of toxicity are required to support the risk assessment of chemicals. The number of chemicals on the global chemical market and the speed of chemical innovation stand in massive contrast to the capacity for regularizing chemical use. We recently proved our ready-to-use application deepFPlearn as a suitable approach for this task. Here, we present its extension deepFPlearn+ incorporating (i) a graph neural network to feed our AI with a more sophisticated molecular structure representation and (ii) alternative train-test splitting strategies that involve scaffold structures and the molecular weights of chemicals. We show that the GNNs outperform the previous model substantially and that our models can generalize on unseen data even with a more robust and challenging test set. Therefore, we highly recommend the application of deepFPlearn+ on the chemical inventory to prioritize chemicals for experimental testing or any chemical subset of interest in monitoring studies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software is compatible with python 3.6 or higher, and the source code can be found on our GitHub repository: https://github.com/yigbt/deepFPlearn. The data underlying this article are available in Zenodo, and can be accessed with the link below: https://zenodo.org/record/8146252. Detailed installation guides via Docker, Singularity, and Conda are provided within the repository for operability across all operating systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.