ArticleThe CRISPR journal2023
The Expanding Dissemination and Distribution Patterns of Diverse CRISPR Plasmids by Addgene.
Article in The CRISPR journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modulating gene expression as a strategy to investigate thyroid cancer biology.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR-based technologies have rapidly enabled the democratization of genome editing in academic institutions through distribution by Addgene over the past decade. Recently, several distribution milestones have been reached, with a collection of >15,000 plasmids deposited by >1,000 laboratories spanning ∼40 countries now shipped 300,000 times to ∼5,000 organizations traversing ∼100 countries. Yet, both deposits of and requests for CRISPR plasmids continue to rise for this disruptive technology. Distribution patterns revealed robust demand for three distinct classes of CRISPR effectors, namely nucleases (e.g., Cas9 and Cas12), modulators (deactivated CRISPR nucleases fused to transcriptional regulators and epigenome modifiers), and chimeric effectors (Cas proteins fused to enzymes carrying out other activities such as deamination, reverse transcription, transposition, and integration). Yearly deposits over the past decade are requested in near-even proportions, reflecting continuous technological development and requests for novel constructs. Though it is unclear whether the slowing rate of requests is inherent to a pandemic operational lag or a transition from emerging to mature technology, it is noteworthy that the relative proportion of requests from plasmids deposited in the previous year remains stable, suggesting robust development of novel tools concurrent with continued adoption of editing, base editing, prime editing, and more. Predictably, most requested plasmids are designed for mammalian genome manipulation, presumably for medical research and human health pursuits, reflecting investments in therapeutic applications. Concurrently, requests for plant and microbial constructs are on the rise, especially in regions of the world more reliant on local agricultural inputs and focused on food and feed applications, illustrating continued diversification of genome editing applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.