Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38011601›Full record

Observational studyCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2023

Killing a fly with a sledgehammer: Atezolizumab exposure in real-world lung cancer patients.

Sophie Marolleau, Alice Mogenet, Clara Boeri, Mourad Hamimed, Joseph Ciccolini, Laurent Greillier

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Pharmacokinetic insights into atezolizumab SC: viability of extended dosing intervals beyond the standard regimen.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sophie MarolleauCOMPO, Inserm U1068 Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille & Inria Sophia Antipolis, Marseille, France.ORCID 0009-0001-0764-4496
Alice MogenetOncologie multidisciplinaire et innovations thérapeutiques, Nord University Hospital of Marseille, Marseille, France.
Clara BoeriCOMPO, Inserm U1068 Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille & Inria Sophia Antipolis, Marseille, France.
Mourad HamimedCOMPO, Inserm U1068 Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille & Inria Sophia Antipolis, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4002-8230
Joseph CiccoliniCOMPO, Inserm U1068 Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille & Inria Sophia Antipolis, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1733-3410
Laurent GreillierCOMPO, Inserm U1068 Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de Marseille & Inria Sophia Antipolis, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5807-9503
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atezolizumab is an anti-PDL1 approved for treating lung cancer. A threshold of 6 μg/mL in plasma has been associated with target engagement. The extent to which patients could be overexposed with the standard 1200 mg q3w dosing remains unknown. Here, we monitored atezolizumab peak and trough levels in 27 real-world patients with lung cancer as part of routine therapeutic drug monitoring. Individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using a population approach and optimal dosing-intervals were simulated with respect to the target trough levels. No patient had plasma levels below 6 μg/mL. The results showed that the mean trough level after the first treatment was 78.3 ± 17 μg/mL, that is, 13 times above the target concentration. The overall response rate was 55.5%. Low-grade immune-related adverse events was observed in 37% of patients. No relationship was found between exposure metrics of atezolizumab (i.e., minimum plasma concentration, maximum plasma concentration, and area under the curve) and pharmacodynamic end points (i.e., efficacy and toxicity). Further simulations suggest that the dosing interval could be extended from 21 days to 49 up to 136 days (mean: 85.7 days, i.e., q12w), while ensuring plasma levels still above the 6 μg/mL target threshold. This observational, real-world study suggests that the standard 1200 mg q3w fixed-dose regimen of atezolizumab results in significant overexposure in all the patients. This was not associated with increased side effects. As plasma levels largely exceed pharmacologically active concentrations, interindividual variability in PK parameters did not impact efficacy. Our data suggest that dosing intervals could be markedly extended with respect to the target threshold associated with efficacy.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizedatezolizumab

Identifiers

PMID38011601
PMCPMC10681534
OpenAlexW4389070879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.