Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38011588›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2024

Synthetic CT generation from MRI using 3D transformer-based denoising diffusion model.

Shaoyan Pan, Elham Abouei, Jacob Wynne, Chih-Wei Chang, Tonghe Wang, Richard L J Qiu, Yuheng Li, Junbo Peng, Justin Roper, Pretesh Patel and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
23.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Transformer Enabled Half Z‑spectrum Sampling BChemical & biomedical imaging · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Foundation Models Meet Medical Image Interpretation.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Deep Learning for CT Synthesis in Radiotherapy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shaoyan PanDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Elham AboueiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jacob WynneDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Chih-Wei ChangDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Tonghe WangDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Richard L J QiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Yuheng LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Junbo PengDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Justin RoperDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Pretesh PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
David S YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Hui MaoDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Xiaofeng YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Emory University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USWinship Cancer Institute

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
eXtended Modular ANthropomorphic (XMAN) phantom for Imaging and Treatment Optimization in Radiotherapy.R01EB032680 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI REN, LEI, YANG, XIAOFENG · 2022 to 2025
$2.4M
Real-time Volumetric Imaging for Motion Management and Dose Delivery VerificationR01CA272991 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Zhen Tian, Xiaofeng Yang · 2023 to 2026
$2.3M
Multiparametric MRI-guided Prostate HDR Brachytherapy with Focal Tumor BoostR01CA215718 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, XIAOFENG · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Artificial Intelligence Driven Platform for PET/MR ImagingR56EB033332 · NIBIB · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MAO, HUI, YANG, XIAOFENG · 2022 to 2022
$764k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA215718NCI NIH HHS R01 CA272991NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032680NIBIB NIH HHS R56 EB033332NIH HHS P30CA008748NIH HHS R01CA215718NIH HHS R01EB032680NIH HHS R56EB033332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based synthetic computed tomography (sCT) simplifies radiation therapy treatment planning by eliminating the need for CT simulation and error-prone image registration, ultimately reducing patient radiation dose and setup uncertainty. In this work, we propose a MRI-to-CT transformer-based improved denoising diffusion probabilistic model (MC-IDDPM) to translate MRI into high-quality sCT to facilitate radiation treatment planning.

methodsMC-IDDPM implements diffusion processes with a shifted-window transformer network to generate sCT from MRI. The proposed model consists of two processes: a forward process, which involves adding Gaussian noise to real CT scans to create noisy images, and a reverse process, in which a shifted-window transformer V-net (Swin-Vnet) denoises the noisy CT scans conditioned on the MRI from the same patient to produce noise-free CT scans. With an optimally trained Swin-Vnet, the reverse diffusion process was used to generate noise-free sCT scans matching MRI anatomy. We evaluated the proposed method by generating sCT from MRI on an institutional brain dataset and an institutional prostate dataset. Quantitative evaluations were conducted using several metrics, including Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), Multi-scale Structure Similarity Index (SSIM), and Normalized Cross Correlation (NCC). Dosimetry analyses were also performed, including comparisons of mean dose and target dose coverages for 95% and 99%.

resultsMC-IDDPM generated brain sCTs with state-of-the-art quantitative results with MAE 48.825 ± 21.491 HU, PSNR 26.491 ± 2.814 dB, SSIM 0.947 ± 0.032, and NCC 0.976 ± 0.019. For the prostate dataset: MAE 55.124 ± 9.414 HU, PSNR 28.708 ± 2.112 dB, SSIM 0.878 ± 0.040, and NCC 0.940 ± 0.039. MC-IDDPM demonstrates a statistically significant improvement (with p < 0.05) in most metrics when compared to competing networks, for both brain and prostate synthetic CT. Dosimetry analyses indicated that the target dose coverage differences by using CT and sCT were within ± 0.34%.

conclusionsWe have developed and validated a novel approach for generating CT images from routine MRIs using a transformer-based improved DDPM. This model effectively captures the complex relationship between CT and MRI images, allowing for robust and high-quality synthetic CT images to be generated in a matter of minutes. This approach has the potential to greatly simplify the treatment planning process for radiation therapy by eliminating the need for additional CT scans, reducing the amount of time patients spend in treatment planning, and enhancing the accuracy of treatment delivery.

Indexed as

HeadTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRadiometryRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisteddeep learningdiffusion modelMRIsynthetic CTtransformer

Identifiers

PMID38011588
PMCPMC10994752
OpenAlexW4389070723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.