Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38011555›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

The impact of COVID-19 on a college freshman sample reveals genetic and nongenetic forms of susceptibility and resilience to stress.

Cortney A Turner, Huzefa Khalil, Virginia Murphy-Weinberg, Megan H Hagenauer, Linda Gates, Yu Tang, Lauren Weinberg, Robert Grysko, Leonor Floran-Garduno, Thomas Dokas and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Transcriptional profiles of antidepressant resistance across the corticolimbic pathway of chronically stressed mice.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The neurobiology of stress: Vulnerability, resilience, and major depression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cortney A Turner *Michigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Huzefa Khalil *Michigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.ORCID 0000-0001-8042-3035
Virginia Murphy-WeinbergMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Megan H HagenauerMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.ORCID 0000-0002-3715-9475
Linda GatesMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Yu TangMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Lauren WeinbergMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Robert GryskoMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Leonor Floran-GardunoMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Thomas DokasMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Catherine SamaniegoMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Zhuo ZhaoMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Yu FangMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Srijan SenMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Juan F LopezMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Stanley J WatsonMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Huda AkilMichigan Neuroscience Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.ORCID 0000-0003-0623-1056
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR)UL1TR002240 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUMENG, JULIE C, MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2017 to 2022
$54.9M
Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR)UM1TR004404 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Julie C Lumeng · 2023 to 2026
$39.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002240NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a longitudinal approach, we sought to define the interplay between genetic and nongenetic factors in shaping vulnerability or resilience to COVID-19 pandemic stress, as indexed by the emergence of symptoms of depression and/or anxiety. University of Michigan freshmen were characterized at baseline using multiple psychological instruments. Subjects were genotyped, and a polygenic risk score for depression (MDD-PRS) was calculated. Daily physical activity and sleep were captured. Subjects were sampled at multiple time points throughout the freshman year on clinical rating scales, including GAD-7 and PHQ-9 for anxiety and depression, respectively. Two cohorts (2019 to 2021) were compared to a pre-COVID-19 cohort to assess the impact of the pandemic. Across cohorts, 26 to 40% of freshmen developed symptoms of anxiety or depression (N = 331). Depression symptoms significantly increased in the pandemic years and became more chronic, especially in females. Physical activity was reduced, and sleep was increased by the pandemic, and this correlated with the emergence of mood symptoms. While low MDD-PRS predicted lower risk for depression during a typical freshman year, this genetic advantage vanished during the pandemic. Indeed, females with lower genetic risk accounted for the majority of the pandemic-induced rise in depression. We developed a model that explained approximately half of the variance in follow-up depression scores based on psychological trait and state characteristics at baseline and contributed to resilience in genetically vulnerable subjects. We discuss the concept of multiple types of resilience, and the interplay between genetic, sex, and psychological factors in shaping the affective response to different types of stressors.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAffectAnxietyAnxiety DisordersDepressionFemaleHumansdepressionpolygenic riskstudents

Identifiers

PMID38011555
PMCPMC10710019
OpenAlexW4389040387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.