ArticlePLoS computational biology2023
On convolutional neural networks for selection inference: Revealing the effect of preprocessing on model learning and the capacity to discover novel patterns.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Popformer: Learning general signatures of positive selection with a self-supervised transformer.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- The persistence and loss of hard selective sweeps amid admixture in ancient Eurasians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Stochastic intracellular calcium dynamics show preserved structures identified by deep learning classification.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Detecting Positive Selection by Modeling Structure Within Images of Genetic Variation.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- AI solutions for evolutionary genomics of nonmodel species.Evolution letters · 2026Review
- Identifying Adaptive Footprints in the Presence of Demographic Uncertainty.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Interpreting Supervised Machine Learning Inferences in Population Genomics Using Haplotype Matrix Permutations.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Assessing simulation-based supervised machine learning for demographic parameter inference from genomic data.Heredity · 2025Article
- Article
- Efficient Detection and Characterization of Targets of Natural Selection Using Transfer Learning.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- ConfuseNN: Interpreting convolutional neural network inferences in population genomics with data shuffling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Efficient detection and characterization of targets of natural selection using transfer learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Digital Image Processing to Detect Adaptive Evolution.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A central challenge in population genetics is the detection of genomic footprints of selection. As machine learning tools including convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have become more sophisticated and applied more broadly, these provide a logical next step for increasing our power to learn and detect such patterns; indeed, CNNs trained on simulated genome sequences have recently been shown to be highly effective at this task. Unlike previous approaches, which rely upon human-crafted summary statistics, these methods are able to be applied directly to raw genomic data, allowing them to potentially learn new signatures that, if well-understood, could improve the current theory surrounding selective sweeps. Towards this end, we examine a representative CNN from the literature, paring it down to the minimal complexity needed to maintain comparable performance; this low-complexity CNN allows us to directly interpret the learned evolutionary signatures. We then validate these patterns in more complex models using metrics that evaluate feature importance. Our findings reveal that preprocessing steps, which determine how the population genetic data is presented to the model, play a central role in the learned prediction method. This results in models that mimic previously-defined summary statistics; in one case, the summary statistic itself achieves similarly high accuracy. For evolutionary processes that are less well understood than selective sweeps, we hope this provides an initial framework for using CNNs in ways that go beyond simply achieving high classification performance. Instead, we propose that CNNs might be useful as tools for learning novel patterns that can translate to easy-to-implement summary statistics available to a wider community of researchers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.