Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38011214›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2023

An evidence-based approach to artificial intelligence education for medical students: A systematic review.

Nikola Pupic, Aryan Ghaffari-Zadeh, Ricky Hu, Rohit Singla, Kathryn Darras, Anna Karwowska, Bruce B Forster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Artificial Intelligence Tools in Psychiatric Education: Innovating While Maintaining Human Connection.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nikola PupicFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9864-1396
Aryan Ghaffari-ZadehFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7930-2177
Ricky HuFaculty of Medicine, Queen's University, Ontario, Kingston, Canada.
Rohit SinglaFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Kathryn DarrasFaculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Anna KarwowskaAssociation of Faculties of Medicine of Canada, Ontario, Ottawa, Canada.
Bruce B ForsterFaculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exponential growth of artificial intelligence (AI) in the last two decades has been recognized by many as an opportunity to improve the quality of patient care. However, medical education systems have been slow to adapt to the age of AI, resulting in a paucity of AI-specific education in medical schools. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the current evidence-based recommendations for the inclusion of an AI education curriculum in undergraduate medicine. Six databases were searched from inception to April 23, 2022 for cross sectional and cohort studies of fair quality or higher on the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, systematic, scoping, and integrative reviews, randomized controlled trials, and Delphi studies about AI education in undergraduate medical programs. The search yielded 991 results, of which 27 met all the criteria and seven more were included using reference mining. Despite the limitations of a high degree of heterogeneity among the study types and a lack of follow-up studies evaluating the impacts of current AI strategies, a thematic analysis of the key AI principles identified six themes needed for a successful implementation of AI in medical school curricula. These themes include ethics, theory and application, communication, collaboration, quality improvement, and perception and attitude. The themes of ethics, theory and application, and communication were further divided into subthemes, including patient-centric and data-centric ethics; knowledge for practice and knowledge for communication; and communication for clinical decision-making, communication for implementation, and communication for knowledge dissemination. Based on the survey studies, medical professionals and students, who generally have a low baseline knowledge of AI, have been strong supporters of adding formal AI education into medical curricula, suggesting more research needs to be done to push this agenda forward.

Identifiers

PMID38011214
PMCPMC10681314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.