Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38011207›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Combination of unsupervised discretization methods for credit risk.

José G Fuentes Cabrera, Hugo A Pérez Vicente, Sebastián Maldonado, Jonás Velasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

José G Fuentes CabreraDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Industrial y de Alimentos, Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico City, México.
Hugo A Pérez VicenteDepartamento de Ingeniería Química, Industrial y de Alimentos, Universidad Iberoamericana Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico City, México.ORCID 0000-0002-0352-4446
Sebastián MaldonadoDepartment of Management Control and Information Systems, School of Economics and Business, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Jonás VelascoCONAHCYT-Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas (CIMAT), Guanajuato, México.ORCID 0000-0001-5347-0805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Creating robust and explainable statistical learning models is essential in credit risk management. For this purpose, equally spaced or frequent discretization is the de facto choice when building predictive models. The methods above have limitations, given that when the discretization procedure is constrained, the underlying patterns are lost. This study introduces an innovative approach by combining traditional discretization techniques with clustering-based discretization, specifically k means and Gaussian mixture models. The study proposes two combinations: Discrete Competitive Combination (DCC) and Discrete Exhaustive Combination (DEC). Discrete Competitive Combination selects features based on the discretization method that performs better on each feature, whereas Discrete Exhaustive Combination includes every discretization method to complement the information not captured by each technique. The proposed combinations were tested on 11 different credit risk datasets by fitting a logistic regression model using the weight of evidence transformation over the training partition and contrasted over the validation partition. The experimental findings showed that both combinations similarly outperform individual methods for the logistic regression without compromising the computational efficiency. More importantly, the proposed method is a feasible and competitive alternative to conventional methods without reducing explainability.

Indexed as

LearningModels, StatisticalCluster AnalysisLogistic Models

Identifiers

PMID38011207
PMCPMC10681304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.