Observational studyRevista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social2023
[Ultrasound-guided insertion and the proportion of catheter-associated thrombosis].
Observational study in Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Central venous accesses are of great importance in daily medical practice. Insertion into the jugular vein is common due to its accessibility. Catheter-associated venous thrombosis is a relatively common medium-term complication. The use of ultrasound to guide catheterization offers multiple advantages and promises to make vascular access installation a safer technique. Objective: To compare the proportion of catheter-associated jugular thrombosis when an anatomical landmark technique is used with respect to the ultrasound-guided technique. Material and methods: An observational, cross-sectional, and analytical study that compares the frequency of thrombosis when the ultrasound-guided technique was used concerning anatomical reference technique in patients in an intensive care unit. Results: A total of 91 patients were studied: in 44 an ultrasound-guided technique was used, and in 47 anatomical references. A single case of mural thrombosis (2.7%) was observed in the ultrasound-guided insertion group vs. 11 cases (23.4%) in the other group, resulting in a significant association between the anatomical reference insertion technique and thrombosis. Chi squared (1, n = 91) = 8.86, p = 0.004. Conclusion: The proportion of catheter-associated jugular thrombosis is greater when an anatomical reference technique is used compared to the ultrasound-guided technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38011190PMC10761189What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.