ArticlePloS one2023
Soft tissue prediction in orthognathic surgery: Improving accuracy by means of anatomical details.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07477873 (Evaluation of Emotional Responses Using the I-Motions System and Self-assessment Questionnaires, and Assessment of Postoperative Anatomical and Structural Units), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of Emotional Responses Using the I-Motions System and Self-assessment Questionnaires, and Assessment of Postoperative Anatomical and Structural Units (TMJ and Masticatory Muscles) in Orthognathic Surgery Patients
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three Data-Driven Lip Soft-Tissue Phenotypes and Their Dento-Skeletal Associations in Orthodontic Patients: An Exploratory Unsupervised Learning Study.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies in Orthognathic and Reconstructive Maxillofacial Surgery: Data Availability and Evidence Maturity.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- State-of-the-art 3D analysis of soft tissue prediction for orthognathic correction of dentofacial deformities in the Egyptian population.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparison of nasolabial changes following Le Fort Ⅰ maxillary advancement versus Medpor implantation in skeletal class Ⅲ patients.Head & face medicine · 2026Article
- Orthodontic-orthognathic combined case management in postgraduate orthodontic and oral maxillofacial surgery programs.Journal of dental education · 2025Article
- Traditional and Artificial Intelligent Methods in Predicting Maxillofacial Soft Tissue Morphology After Orthognathic Surgery: A Narrative Review.International journal of dentistry · 2025Review
- Anatomic and functional masseter muscle adaptation following orthognathic surgery-MRI analysis in 3 years of follow-up.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2024Article
- The Accuracy of Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Simulation in Orthognathic Surgery-A Systematic Review.Journal of imaging · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional virtual simulation of orthognathic surgery is now a well-established method in maxillo-facial surgery. The commercial software packages are still burdened by a consistent imprecision on soft tissue predictions. In this study, the authors produced an anatomically detailed patient specific numerical model for simulation of soft tissue changes in orthognathic surgery. Eight patients were prospectively enrolled. Each patient underwent CBCT and planar x-rays prior to surgery and in addition received an MRI scan. Postoperative soft-tissue change was simulated using Finite Element Modeling (FEM) relying on a patient-specific 3D models generated combining data from preoperative CBCT (hard tissue) scans and MRI scans (muscles and skin). An initial simulation was performed assuming that all the muscles and the other soft tissue had the same material properties (Homogeneous Model). This model was compared with the postoperative CBCT 3D simulation for validation purpose. Design of experiments (DoE) was used to assess the effect of the presence of the muscles considered and of their variation in stiffness. The effect of single muscles was evaluated in specific areas of the midface. The quantitative distance error between the homogeneous model and actual patient surfaces for the midface area was 0.55 mm, standard deviation 2.9 mm. In our experience, including muscles in the numerical simulation of orthognathic surgery, brought an improvement in the quality of the simulation obtained.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.