Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38011176›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Deep learning for the prediction of clinical outcomes in internet-delivered CBT for depression and anxiety.

Niranjani Prasad, Isabel Chien, Tim Regan, Angel Enrique, Jorge Palacios, Dessie Keegan, Usman Munir, Ryutaro Tanno, Hannah Richardson, Aditya Nori and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Niranjani PrasadMicrosoft Health Futures, Microsoft Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Isabel ChienCambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Tim ReganCambridge Respiratory Innovations, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Angel EnriqueSilverCloud Science, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland.
Jorge PalaciosSilverCloud Science, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland.
Dessie KeeganSilverCloud Science, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland.
Usman MunirMicrosoft Health Futures, Microsoft Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ryutaro TannoGSK, London, United Kingdom.
Hannah RichardsonMicrosoft Health Futures, Microsoft Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Aditya NoriMicrosoft Health Futures, Microsoft Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Derek RichardsSilverCloud Science, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0871-4078
Gavin DohertySilverCloud Science, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9617-7008
Danielle BelgraveGSK, London, United Kingdom.
Anja ThiemeMicrosoft Health Futures, Microsoft Research, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In treating depression and anxiety, just over half of all clients respond. Monitoring and obtaining early client feedback can allow for rapidly adapted treatment delivery and improve outcomes. This study seeks to develop a state-of-the-art deep-learning framework for predicting clinical outcomes in internet-delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (iCBT) by leveraging large-scale, high-dimensional time-series data of client-reported mental health symptoms and platform interaction data. We use de-identified data from 45,876 clients on SilverCloud Health, a digital platform for the psychological treatment of depression and anxiety. We train deep recurrent neural network (RNN) models to predict whether a client will show reliable improvement by the end of treatment using clinical measures, interaction data with the iCBT program, or both. Outcomes are based on total improvement in symptoms of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, PHQ-9) and anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, GAD-7), as reported within the iCBT program. Using internal and external datasets, we compare the proposed models against several benchmarks and rigorously evaluate them according to their predictive accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and AUROC over treatment. Our proposed RNN models consistently predict reliable improvement in PHQ-9 and GAD-7, using past clinical measures alone, with above 87% accuracy and 0.89 AUROC after three or more review periods, outperforming all benchmark models. Additional evaluations demonstrate the robustness of the achieved models across (i) different health services; (ii) geographic locations; (iii) iCBT programs, and (iv) client severity subgroups. Results demonstrate the robust performance of dynamic prediction models that can yield clinically helpful prognostic information ready for implementation within iCBT systems to support timely decision-making and treatment adjustments by iCBT clinical supporters towards improved client outcomes.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyDeep LearningAnxietyAnxiety DisordersDepressionHumansInternetTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38011176
PMCPMC10681250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.