Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38011168›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Using Twitter to collect a multi-dialectal corpus of Albanian using advanced geotagging and dialect modeling.

Ercan Canhasi, Rexhep Shijaku

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ercan CanhasiFaculty of Computer Science, University of Prizren, Prizren, Kosova.ORCID 0000-0003-2295-1467
Rexhep ShijakuFaculty of Computer Science, University of Prizren, Prizren, Kosova.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we present the acquisition and categorization of a geographically-informed, multi-dialectal Albanian National Corpus, derived from Twitter data. The primary dialects from three distinct regions-Albania, Kosovo, and North Macedonia-are considered. The assembled publicly available dataset encompasses anonymized user information, user-generated tweets, auxiliary tweet-related data, and annotations corresponding to dialect categories. Utilizing a highly automated scraping approach, we initially identified over 1,000 Twitter users with discernible locations who actively employ at least one of the targeted Albanian dialects. Subsequent data extraction phases yielded an augmentation of the preliminary dataset with an additional 1,500 Twitterers. The study also explores the application of advanced geotagging techniques to expedite corpus generation. Alongside experimentation with diverse classification methodologies, comprehensive feature engineering and feature selection investigations were conducted. A subjective assessment is conducted using human annotators, which demonstrates that humans achieve significantly lower accuracy rates in comparison to machine learning (ML) models. Our findings indicate that machine learning algorithms are proficient in accurately differentiating various Albanian dialects, even when analyzing individual tweets. A meticulous evaluation of the most salient attributes of top-performing algorithms provides insights into the decision-making mechanisms utilized by these models. Remarkably, our investigation revealed numerous dialectal patterns that, despite being familiar to human annotators, have not been widely acknowledged within the broader scientific community.

Indexed as

Social MediaAlbaniaAlgorithmsHumansLanguageMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID38011168
PMCPMC10681245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.