ArticlePloS one2023
Enteric pharmacokinetics of monomeric and multimeric camelid nanobody single-domain antibodies.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- An anti-Shiga toxin VHH nanobody multimer protects mice against fatal toxicosis when administered intramuscularly as repRNA.Infection and immunity · 2024Article
- Fit-for-purpose heterodivalent single-domain antibody for gastrointestinal targeting of toxin B from Clostridium difficile.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-domain antibodies (sdAbs) derived from Camelidae heavy-chain-only antibodies (also called nanobodies or VHHs) have advantages over conventional antibodies in terms of their small size and stability to pH and temperature extremes, their ability to express well in microbial hosts, and to be functionally multimerized for enhanced properties. For these reasons, VHHs are showing promise as enteric disease therapeutics, yet little is known as to their pharmacokinetics (PK) within the digestive tract. To improve understanding of enteric VHH PK, we investigated the functional and structural stability of monomeric and multimeric camelid VHH-agents following in vitro incubation with intestinal extracts (chyme) from rabbits and pigs or fecal extracts from human sources, and in vivo in rabbits. The results showed that unstructured domains such as epitopic tags and flexible spacers composed of different amino acid sequences were rapidly degraded by enteric proteases while the functional core VHHs were much more stable to these treatments. Individual VHHs were widely variable in their functional stability to GI tract proteases. Some VHH-based agents which neutralize enteric Shiga toxin Stx2 displayed a functional stability to chyme incubations comparable to that of Stx2-neutralizing IgG and IgA mAbs, thus indicating that selected nanobodies can approach the functional stability of conventional immunoglobulins. Enteric PK data obtained from in vitro incubation studies were consistent with similar incubations performed in vivo in rabbit surgical gut loops. These findings have broad implications for enteric use of VHH-based agents, particularly VHH fusion proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.