Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38011093›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Comparative chromosome painting in three Pelecaniformes species (Aves): Exploring the role of macro and microchromosome fusions in karyotypic evolution.

Igor Chamon Assumpção Seligmann, Ivanete de Oliveira Furo, Michelly da Silva Dos Santos, Ricardo José Gunski, Analía Del Valle Garnero, Fabio Augusto Oliveira Silva, Patricia O Brien, Malcolm Ferguson-Smith, Rafael Kretschmer, Edivaldo Herculano C de Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Igor Chamon Assumpção SeligmannPrograma de Pós-graduação em Biodiversidade e Biotecnologia da Rede Bionorte, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Ivanete de Oliveira FuroLaboratório de Reprodução Animal, LABRAC, Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, UFRA, Parauapebas, State of Pará, Brazil.
Michelly da Silva Dos SantosPrograma de Pós-graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, State of Pará, Brazil.
Ricardo José GunskiPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pampa, Campus São Gabriel, São Gabriel, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Analía Del Valle GarneroPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pampa, Campus São Gabriel, São Gabriel, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Fabio Augusto Oliveira SilvaPrograma de Pós-graduação em Neurociência e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, State of Pará, Brazil.
Patricia O BrienCambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Malcolm Ferguson-SmithCambridge Resource Centre for Comparative Genomics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Rafael KretschmerDepartamento de Ecologia, Zoologia e Genética, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6856-2152
Edivaldo Herculano C de OliveiraFaculdade de Ciências Naturais, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Naturais, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, State of Pará, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6315-3352

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelecaniformes is an order of waterbirds that exhibit diverse and distinct morphologies. Ibis, heron, pelican, hammerkop, and shoebill are included within the order. Despite their fascinating features, the phylogenetic relationships among the families within Pelecaniformes remain uncertain and pose challenges due to their complex evolutionary history. Their karyotypic evolution is another little-known aspect. Therefore, to shed light on the chromosomal rearrangements that have occurred during the evolution of Pelecaniformes, we have used whole macrochromosome probes from Gallus gallus (GGA) to show homologies on three species with different diploid numbers, namely Cochlearius cochlearius (2n = 74), Eudocimus ruber (2n = 66), and Syrigma sibilatrix (2n = 62). A fusion between GGA6 and GGA7 was found in C. cochlearius and S. sibilatrix. In S. sibilatrix the GGA8, GGA9 and GGA10 hybridized to the long arms of biarmed macrochromosomes, indicating fusions with microchromosomes. In E. ruber the GGA7 and GGA8 hybridized to the same chromosome pair. After comparing our painting results with previously published data, we show that distinct chromosomal rearrangements have occurred in different Pelecaniformes lineages. Our study provides new insight into the evolutionary history of Pelecaniformes and the chromosomal changes involving their macrochromosomes and microchromosomes that have taken place in different species within this order.

Indexed as

ChickensChromosome PaintingAnimalsChromosome AberrationsEvolution, MolecularHumansKaryotypeKaryotypingPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID38011093
PMCPMC10681242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.