SynthesisPediatric pulmonology2024
A systematic review of antimicrobial therapy in children with tracheostomies.
Synthesis in Pediatric pulmonology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of antimicrobial therapy in children with tracheostomies.Pediatric pulmonology · 2024Pooled it
- Antibiotic Use Among Children Requiring Respiratory Support in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) from Sofia, Bulgaria: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Factors associated with delayed decannulation within 180 days after pediatric tracheostomy in the PICU: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- From PICU to home: a longitudinal airway safety framework for children with tracheostomies.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Efficacy of inhaled antibiotics in children with ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Tracheostomies are indicated in children to facilitate long-term ventilatory support, aid in the management of secretions, or manage upper airway obstruction. Children with tracheostomies often experience ongoing airway complications, of which respiratory tract infections are common. They subsequently receive frequent courses of broad-spectrum antimicrobials for the prevention or treatment of respiratory tract infections. However, there is little consensus in practice with regard to the indication for treatment/prophylactic antimicrobial use, choice of antimicrobial, route of administration, or duration of treatment between different centers. Routine antibiotic use is associated with adverse effects and an increased risk of antimicrobial resistance. Tracheal cultures are commonly obtained from pediatric tracheostomy patients, with the aim of helping guide antimicrobial therapy choice. However, a positive culture alone is not diagnostic of infection and the role of routine surveillance cultures remains contentious. Inhaled antimicrobial use is also widespread in the management of tracheostomy-associated infections; this is largely based on the theoretical benefits of higher airway antibiotic concentrations. The role of prophylactic inhaled antimicrobial use for tracheostomy-associated infections remains largely unproven. This systematic review summarizes the current evidence base for antimicrobial selection, duration, and administration route in pediatric tracheostomy-associated infections. It also highlights significant variation in practice between centers and the urgent need for further prospective evidence to guide the management of these vulnerable patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.