Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38010828›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of general practice2023

Patients' perceptions of climate-sensitive health counselling in primary care: Qualitative results from Germany.

Silvan Griesel, Patricia Nayna Schwerdtle, Claudia Quitmann, Ina Danquah, Alina Herrmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of general practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patients' Attitudes Towards Integrating Environmental Sustainability Into Healthcare Decision-Making: An Interview Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Silvan GrieselHeidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), University Hospital Heidelberg and Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3686-3847
Patricia Nayna SchwerdtleHeidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), University Hospital Heidelberg and Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Claudia QuitmannHeidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), University Hospital Heidelberg and Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6470-8847
Ina DanquahHeidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), University Hospital Heidelberg and Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Alina HerrmannHeidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), University Hospital Heidelberg and Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6502-106X
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClimate change is the greatest threat to global health in the twenty first century, yet combating it entails substantial health co-benefits. Physicians and other health professionals have not yet fully embraced their responsibilities in the climate crisis, especially about their communication with patients. While medical associations are calling on physicians to integrate climate change into health counselling, there is little empirical evidence about corresponding perceptions of patients.

objectivesThis study aimed to explore primary care patients' perceptions of climate-sensitive health counselling.

methodsFrom July to December 2021, 27 qualitative interviews with patients were conducted and analysed using thematic analysis. A purposive sampling technique was applied to identify patients who had already experienced climate-sensitive health counselling in Germany.

resultsPatients' perceptions of climate-sensitive health counselling were characterised by a high level of acceptance, which was enhanced by stressing the link between climate change and health, being credible concerning physician's own climate-friendly lifestyle, building upon good therapeutic relationships, creating a sense of solidarity, and working in a patient centred manner. Challenges and risks for acceptance were patients' disinterest or surprise, time constraints, feared politicisation of consultations, and evoking feelings of guilt and shame.

conclusionThese findings suggest that primary care patients can accept climate-sensitive health counselling, if it follows certain principles of communication, including patient-centredness. Our findings can be useful for developing communication guidelines, respective policies as well as well-designed intervention studies, which are needed to test the health and environmental effects of climate-sensitive health counselling.

Indexed as

CommunicationLife StyleCounselingGermanyHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchClimate changeclimate-sensitive health counsellinggeneral practicehealth communicationpatient-centerednesspatient educationprimary care

Identifiers

PMID38010828
PMCPMC10773651
OpenAlexW4389044993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.