Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38010650›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Sodium Levels and Outcomes in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Nivolumab.

Martina Catalano, Sara Elena Rebuzzi, Marco Maruzzo, Ugo De Giorgi, Sebastiano Buti, Luca Galli, Giuseppe Fornarini, Paolo Andrea Zucali, Giuseppe Procopio, Silvia Chiellino and 24 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.

Martina CatalanoDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
Sara Elena RebuzziMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Paolo, Savona, Italy.
Marco MaruzzoOncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Ugo De GiorgiDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy.
Sebastiano ButiMedical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Luca GalliMedical Oncology Unit 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Giuseppe FornariniMedical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Paolo Andrea ZucaliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milano, Italy.
Giuseppe ProcopioSS Oncologia Medica Genitourinaria, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy.
Silvia ChiellinoMedical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Michele MilellaSection of Innovation Biomedicine-Oncology Area, Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona and Verona University and Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy.
Fabio CatalanoMedical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Stefania PipitoneMedical Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Riccardo RicottaOncology Unit, IRCCS MultiMedica, Sesto san Giovanni, Milano, Italy.
Mariella SorarùU.O. Oncologia, Ospedale di Camposampiero, Camposampiero, Italy.
Veronica MollicaMedical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Marianna TudiniMedical Oncology, St Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.
Lucia FratinoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano CRO-IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Veronica PratiMedical Oncology Unit, ASL CN 2, Alba-Bra, Italy.
Orazio CaffoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.
Francesco AtzoriMedical Oncology Department, University Hospital, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Franco MorelliMedical Oncology Department, Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza Hospital, IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
Giuseppe PratiDepartment of Oncology and Advanced Technologies AUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Franco NolèMedical Oncology Division of Urogenital & Head & Neck Tumors, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
Francesca VignaniDivision of Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy.
Alessia CavoOncology Unit, Villa Scassi Hospital, Genova, Italy.
Marilena Di NapoliDepartment of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
Andrea MalgeriDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, Roma, Italy.
Emanuele NaglieriDivision of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy.
Alessio SignoriDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Biostatistics, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Giuseppe Luigi BannaPortsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
Pasquale RescignoCandiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Lorenzo AntonuzzoMedical Oncology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giandomenico RovielloDepartment of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy.
University of Florence · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITA. O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITAzienda Sanitaria Locale CN2 · ITAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITCampus Bio Medico University Hospital · ITCandiolo Cancer Institute · ITCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · ITCentro di Riferimento Oncologico · ITEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITHumanitas University · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITIstituto Oncologico Veneto · ITIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITIstituto Tumori Bari · ITMultiMedica · ITOspedale San Paolo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Low sodium levels have been associated with negative outcomes among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) receiving therapies other than immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Objective: To investigate the role of natremia in patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab as a second-line or subsequent therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study, the clinical and biochemical data of patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab were collected from October 2015 to November 2019 as part of a multicenter Italian study. Data analysis was performed from February to March 2023. Exposure: Nivolumab was administered intravenously at a dose of 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks and, since May 2018, at a fixed dose of 240 mg every 2 weeks or 480 mg every 4 weeks. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their median serum sodium value (<140 or ≥140 mEq/L). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were the associations of pre-ICI and post-ICI sodium levels with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and disease control rate (DCR). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS, and differences between groups were compared using the log-rank test. Results: A total of 401 patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab as second-line therapy were evaluated, and 355 eligible patients (median [range] age, 76 [44-84] years; 258 male patients [72.7%]) were included in the final cohort. Among patients with pre-ICI sodium greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L compared with those with sodium less than 140 mEq/L, the median PFS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 6.5-11.5 months) vs 7.4 months (95% CI, 4.6-10.1 months; P = .90), and the median OS was 29.2 months (95% CI, 21.8-35.9 months) vs 20.0 months (95% CI, 14.1-26.8 months; P = .03). Patients with post-ICI sodium values greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L had longer PFS (11.1 months [95% CI, 8.5-1.5 months] vs 5.1 months [95% CI, 4.1-7.5 months]; P = .01) and OS (32.9 months [95% CI, 25.1-42.6 months] vs 17.1 months [95% CI, 12.6-24.5 months]; P = .006) compared with patients with sodium values less than 140 mEq/L. Patients with both pre-ICI and post-ICI sodium values greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L exhibited a significant improvement in clinical outcomes compared with those with a value less than 140 mEq/L (PFS, 11.5 months [95% CI, 8.8-16.4 months] vs 5.8 months [95% CI, 4.4-8.3 months]; P = .008); OS, 37.6 months [95% CI, 29.0-49.9 months] vs 19.4 months [95% CI, 14.1-24.5 months]; P = .01). Moreover, sodium levels greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L were associated with significantly better DCR than lower sodium levels. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective cohort study of patients with mRCC receiving nivolumab, sodium values greater than or equal to 140 mEq/L, both before and/or after ICI, were associated with better OS and PFS, as well as a higher DCR, compared with levels less than 140 mEq/L. These findings suggest that sodium levels may be associated with survival outcomes in patients with mRCC and may have potential use as variables to consider in patients' risk scores.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsAgedHumansMaleNivolumabRetrospective StudiesSodiumNivolumabSodium

Identifiers

PMID38010650
PMCPMC10682835
OpenAlexW4389058635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.